2009
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low redshift AGN in the Hamburg/ESO survey

Abstract: We present a determination of the local (z ≈ 0) luminosity function of optically selected type 1 (broad-line) active galactic nuclei. Our primary resource is the Hamburg/ESO survey (HES), which provides a well-defined sample of more than 300 optically bright AGN with redshifts z < 0.3 and blue magnitudes B < ∼ 17.5. AGN luminosities were estimated in two ways, always taking care to minimise photometric biases due to host galaxy light contamination. Firstly, we measured broad-band B J (blue) magnitudes of the o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
53
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, there is fair agreement between the space densities of unobscured (log N H /cm 2 = 20−21.5) X-ray-selected AGNs and UV/optically selected QSOs. At low redshift, the Schulze et al (2009) luminosity function appears to exceed the X-ray space densities of unobscured AGNs below about L X (2−10 keV) ≈ 10 43 erg s −1 . A similar trend has been reported by Schulze et al (2009) when comparing their luminosity function with the soft-band (0.5-2 keV) X-ray luminosity function of Hasinger, Miyaji & Schmidt (2005).…”
Section: Comparison With Uv-selected Agnsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, there is fair agreement between the space densities of unobscured (log N H /cm 2 = 20−21.5) X-ray-selected AGNs and UV/optically selected QSOs. At low redshift, the Schulze et al (2009) luminosity function appears to exceed the X-ray space densities of unobscured AGNs below about L X (2−10 keV) ≈ 10 43 erg s −1 . A similar trend has been reported by Schulze et al (2009) when comparing their luminosity function with the soft-band (0.5-2 keV) X-ray luminosity function of Hasinger, Miyaji & Schmidt (2005).…”
Section: Comparison With Uv-selected Agnsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The conversion of QSO absolute optical magnitudes into X-ray luminosities follows the steps described in Croom et al (2009). At lower redshift, z < 0.4, we also compare our results with the broad-line AGN luminosity function presented by Schulze, Wisotzki & Husemann (2009). From the latter study, we use the double power-law parametrization of the redshift z = 0 bolometric 5 is also included to determine the broad-line AGN luminosity function at redshifts z > 0.…”
Section: Comparison With Uv-selected Agnsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, the results of our tests indicate that the bulge-brightness fit uncertainties (a few tenths of dex in luminosity) are not large enough to explain our finding. Schulze et al (2009) reported that they did not correct their continuum luminosities L 5100 for the host galaxy contribution. However, this effect is expected to be weak and more importantly shift the black hole masses to even lower masses.…”
Section: Black Hole Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare this mass to other mass estimates (Table 3) and find an Eddington ratio of λ ≈ 0.3, implying that the black hole is efficiently growing. For 74 galaxies from the LLQSO sample, BH masses are available from Schulze et al (2009), Schulze & Wisotzki (2010), and Schulze (priv. comm.).…”
Section: The Central Black Holementioning
confidence: 99%