2021
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpab043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low resistance but high resilience to drought of flushing Norway spruce seedlings

Abstract: Spring drought episodes are becoming more frequent and intensive in European temperate forests. To study tree resilience to spring drought, Norway spruce seedlings were exposed to three levels of drought stress (well-watered (W), moderately stressed (M), and severely stressed (S)) for 42 days and then fully irrigated for 14 days. Drought strongly reduced gas exchange parameters for both M and S seedlings. After 42 days, stomatal conductance was lower by 83% and 97% in M and S, respectively, than in W seedlings… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, based on the inability to reliably predict stomatal conductance from RWC or Ψ p levels, we conclude that g sw recovery in both pine and spruce is limited by certain non‐hydraulic factors (see Brodribb & Cochard, 2009). More rapid and complete restoration of leaf water status compared to gas exchange was also found in other studies on Pinaceae species (see, e.g., Hájíčková et al, 2021; Rehschuh et al, 2020). We propose that the analysis of the dependence of stomatal dynamics on not only Ψ leaf but also on other main parameters of leaf water status (Ψ p and RWC) is necessary to be performed to understand whether post‐drought g sw recovery is actually limited by the recovery of leaf hydraulic supply or by non‐hydraulic factors (Brodribb & Cochard, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Therefore, based on the inability to reliably predict stomatal conductance from RWC or Ψ p levels, we conclude that g sw recovery in both pine and spruce is limited by certain non‐hydraulic factors (see Brodribb & Cochard, 2009). More rapid and complete restoration of leaf water status compared to gas exchange was also found in other studies on Pinaceae species (see, e.g., Hájíčková et al, 2021; Rehschuh et al, 2020). We propose that the analysis of the dependence of stomatal dynamics on not only Ψ leaf but also on other main parameters of leaf water status (Ψ p and RWC) is necessary to be performed to understand whether post‐drought g sw recovery is actually limited by the recovery of leaf hydraulic supply or by non‐hydraulic factors (Brodribb & Cochard, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The reduced growth was partly caused by dry leader shoots, but it can also be caused by reduced photosynthesis (Helenius et al 2005b) and/or earlier growth cessation (Matisons et al 2021). Hájíčková et al (2021) studied the resistance of four-year-old Norway spruce seedlings to drought stress during flushing. They observed that the shoot growth reduced more under severe drought stress, whereas moderate stress affected root growth more.…”
Section: Planting Periods and Growing Phase Of Seedlingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, recovery of stomatal conductance is often delayed compared to other physiological traits [ 2 ]. Delayed or incomplete recovery of gas exchange after water stress relief is often observed in various conifers [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. High drought sensitivity of stomatal conductance and delayed and/or insufficient recovery of stomatal conductance together cause plants to experience a prolonged period of diminished gas exchange and assimilation, thus deteriorating plant carbon balance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%