54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2016
DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-0286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Reynolds Number Acceleration of Flat Plate Wings at High Incidence (Invited)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, it has been shown that between rotation and translation cases, the progression of the LEV over the wing surface is initially very similar before the LEV detaches for the translating wing, but remains attached if the wing is rotating [36]. A large collaborative effort across many research groups compared cases of revolving and translating rectangular wings at both fixed and time-varying angles of attack [37,38]. They found consistent LEV shedding for the translating wings [37] and that, whether wings were revolving or translating, there was no significant effect on the mean force coefficients after the initial vortex growth [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, it has been shown that between rotation and translation cases, the progression of the LEV over the wing surface is initially very similar before the LEV detaches for the translating wing, but remains attached if the wing is rotating [36]. A large collaborative effort across many research groups compared cases of revolving and translating rectangular wings at both fixed and time-varying angles of attack [37,38]. They found consistent LEV shedding for the translating wings [37] and that, whether wings were revolving or translating, there was no significant effect on the mean force coefficients after the initial vortex growth [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large collaborative effort across many research groups compared cases of revolving and translating rectangular wings at both fixed and time-varying angles of attack [37,38]. They found consistent LEV shedding for the translating wings [37] and that, whether wings were revolving or translating, there was no significant effect on the mean force coefficients after the initial vortex growth [38]. This suggests that whether the LEV is attached to a revolving wing, or detaching from a translating wing the lift generated does not differ substantially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vortex breakup was seen for the accelerating (surging) flat plate cases. 9 Leading-edge and trailing-edge vortices were shown to convect downstream at differing speeds. 9 One study by Bernal 10 showed that the leading-edge vortex and trailing-edge vortex merged downstream and a new leading-edge vortex was formed.…”
Section: B Flat Plate Simulations and Dynamic Stallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Leading-edge and trailing-edge vortices were shown to convect downstream at differing speeds. 9 One study by Bernal 10 showed that the leading-edge vortex and trailing-edge vortex merged downstream and a new leading-edge vortex was formed. Some arching of the leading-edge vortex was observed for pitching motion by Jones et al 11…”
Section: B Flat Plate Simulations and Dynamic Stallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= geometric aspect ratio (=2), b 2 /S, m AR eff = effective aspect ratio, 2* AR , m b = wing wetted span, 2*c, m C D = drag coefficient, 2*D/U 2 = angle of attack, degree α" m = maximum pitch acceleration, degrees per second squared α(t) = pitch rate, degrees per second U ∞ = constant free stream velocity, meter per second…”
Section: Armentioning
confidence: 99%