2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3629815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-Reynolds-number gravity-driven migration and deformation of bubbles near a free surface

Abstract: Résumé :On examine l'ascension de bulles au voisinage de Abstract : The gravity-driven migration of N ≥ 1 bubble(s) near a free surface is addressed within the assumption of negligible inertial effects by solving a boundary-integral equation at each time and assuming axisymmetric free surface and bubble(s) with axis of revolution aligned with the gravity. The implemented boundary element method permits one to accurately invert at a reasonable cpu time cost the encountered boundary integration on the liquid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
61
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the low-Reynolds-number limit, the various computational studies based on the BIM (Chi & Leal 1989;Manga & Stone 1995;Pigeonneau & Sellier 2011) consistently show that increasing Bo and B I up to O(10) values slows down the film drainage, while no significant influence of interfacial forces is observed for larger values. Indeed, increasing Bo and B I allows the two boundaries of the film to deform more easily, causing the film thickness to remain more uniform during the drainage process.…”
Section: A Toroidal Bubblementioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the low-Reynolds-number limit, the various computational studies based on the BIM (Chi & Leal 1989;Manga & Stone 1995;Pigeonneau & Sellier 2011) consistently show that increasing Bo and B I up to O(10) values slows down the film drainage, while no significant influence of interfacial forces is observed for larger values. Indeed, increasing Bo and B I allows the two boundaries of the film to deform more easily, causing the film thickness to remain more uniform during the drainage process.…”
Section: A Toroidal Bubblementioning
confidence: 77%
“…Among the two situations involving O(1) viscosity ratios (solid and dash-dotted lines in figure 16), the smaller B I the faster the drainage, in agreement with previous low-Reynolds-number findings. In those two cases, the drainage is found to be significantly slower than in the free-surface situations recently considered by Pigeonneau & Sellier (2011), as shown by comparing the solid line with the squares (B I ≈ 3 in both cases) and the dash-dotted line with the triangles (B I 12 in both cases). As this trend is observed for any B I , we can conclude that the difference is due to the viscosity ratio: the smaller Λ, the more efficient the drainage since the stretching of the upper film surface does not induce any significant stress (hence no dissipation) when Λ 1.…”
Section: A Toroidal Bubblementioning
confidence: 85%
“…This acceleration region is observed far all different bubbles tested, suggesting the development of a positive temperature gradient upstream of the bubble that could result from the interaction between the bubble and the molten glass in the heat transfer balance. Near the top of the crucible, the bubble slowdown may also be due to the hydrodynamic interaction between the bubble and the free surface …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the experiments, bubble motion underwent two stages. The first stage was the buoyant ascent of the bubble toward the interface and the second was the drainage of the interfacial film above the stationary bubble [ Pigeonneau and Sellier , ]. Once the bubble approached the surface, its rise velocity rapidly decreased, forming a protruding hemispherical cap of radius, Rcap R=(3V/4π)1/3, where V is the volume of the bubble.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%