2018
DOI: 10.1017/aer.2018.124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Reynolds number proprotor aerodynamic performance improvement using the continuous surface curvature design approach

Abstract: Low Reynolds number blade profiles of ReC=105–2×105 as based on the chord length and used for small unnamed air vehicles, and near space applications are investigated for single and counter-rotating (co-axial) proprotors, i.e. acting as rotors or propellers. Such profiles are prone for early stall, significantly reducing their maximum lift to drag ratio. Two profiles previously designed by our continuous surface curvature design approach named as CIRCLE are investigated in order to improve the performance of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors demonstrated an enhancement in the energy output efficiency of a 3-kW small wind turbine. Similarly, Avital et al (11) used a continuous surface curvature design approach named CIRCLE (12) (presCrIbed suRface Curvature distribution bLade dEsign) and redesigned two standard aerofoils (the symmetric NACA0012 and asymmetric E387) to improve the aerodynamic performance of low-Re proprotors for UAVs. The study included analysis of single and co-axial proprotors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors demonstrated an enhancement in the energy output efficiency of a 3-kW small wind turbine. Similarly, Avital et al (11) used a continuous surface curvature design approach named CIRCLE (12) (presCrIbed suRface Curvature distribution bLade dEsign) and redesigned two standard aerofoils (the symmetric NACA0012 and asymmetric E387) to improve the aerodynamic performance of low-Re proprotors for UAVs. The study included analysis of single and co-axial proprotors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%