2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2012.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low sensitivity of the echocardiograph compared with contrast transcranial Doppler in right-to-left shunt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several previous studies demonstrate the low sensitivity of TTE compared with TEE. 20 , 21 A meta-analysis also suggested that when contrast TEE is used as the gold standard, routine c-TTE diagnoses intracardiac RLS with a sensitivity of 46% and specificity of 99%, 22 which was similar to that reported in our study. Another meta-analysis revealed that TCD yielded a weighted mean sensitivity and specificity for were 97% and 93%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Several previous studies demonstrate the low sensitivity of TTE compared with TEE. 20 , 21 A meta-analysis also suggested that when contrast TEE is used as the gold standard, routine c-TTE diagnoses intracardiac RLS with a sensitivity of 46% and specificity of 99%, 22 which was similar to that reported in our study. Another meta-analysis revealed that TCD yielded a weighted mean sensitivity and specificity for were 97% and 93%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Despite the fact that the patient's ischemic stroke did not arise from the right atrial thrombi, we need to keep in mind that paradoxical emboli are not uncommon causes of ischemic stroke in the presence of right-to-left shunts [9]. TEE may not able to detect all the right-to left shunts, given the relatively high false negative rate of TEE [10]. Transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD) may be performed to further detect any right-to-left shunt missed by TEE due to the smaller size [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, compared with TEE and TTE, contrast transcranial Doppler (c-TCD) (Alexandrov et al 2012; Van et al 2010) has high sensitivity in detecting cardiac and non-cardiac RLS. The advantages of c-TCD may be caused by the presence of extra-cardiac RLS (Alexandrov et al 2012;Mart ınez-S anchez et al 2012). Moreover, additional advantages include its low cost, tolerability (Tsivgoulis et al 2011) and ability to detect microbubbles (MBs) as emboli pass intra-cranial arteries in real time (Alexandrov et al 2012), which enhances RLS during the Valsalva maneuver (VM), which can be standardized by observing the decrease in cerebral blood flow velocity (Jauss and Zanette 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%