Winning aggressive disputes can enhance future fighting ability and the desire to seek out additional contests. In some instances, these effects are long lasting and vary in response to the physical location of a fight. Thus, in principle, winning aggressive encounters may cause long-term and context-dependent changes to brain areas that control the output of antagonistic behavior or the motivation to fight (or both). We examined this issue in the territorial California mouse (Peromyscus californicus) because males of this species are more likely to win fights after accruing victories in their home territory but not after accruing victories in unfamiliar locations. Using immunocytochemistry and real-time quantitative PCR, we found that winning fights either at home or away increases the expression of androgen receptors (AR) in the medial anterior bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, a key brain area that controls social aggression. We also found that AR expression in brain regions that mediate motivation and reward, nucleus accumbens (NAcc) and ventral tegmental area (VTA), increases only in response to fights in the home territory. These effects of winning were likely exclusive to the neural androgenic system because they have no detectible impact on the expression of progestin receptors. Finally, we demonstrated that the observed changes in androgen sensitivity in the NAcc and VTA are positively associated with the ability to win aggressive contests. Thus, winning fights can change brain phenotype in a manner that likely promotes future victory and possibly primes neural circuits that motivate individuals to fight.aggression | androgen and progestin receptors | behavioral reinforcement | neurobiology | winner effect S ocial experiences that individuals accrue throughout life can modify the brain's morphology and hormonal milieu (1, 2). These changes are often thought to adjust future social behavior because they occur in brain areas that control affective state, arousal, and motivation (3). However, less is known about how the environment of a given social encounter modulates its subsequent effects on the brain. We examined this issue here by testing (i) whether winning fights modifies neural circuits that control social aggression and motivation and (ii) whether a fight's environment, in turn, modulates any of these effects.Winning aggressive disputes or competitions can affect future behavior (4, 5). For example, individuals that win fights are more likely to win later in life (6). In some species, this so-called winner effect is long lasting and forms only in response to victories in certain locations (6). Although mechanistic studies of the winner effect focus on how postencounter changes in steroid hormones adjust future winning behavior (7), this physiological model is less suitable for species in which the winner effect either persists well after excess hormones are cleared from circulation or depends on a fight's environment (8, 9). Thus, it is possible that the experience of victory induces long-term ...