2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.105863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low specificity of point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen (POC CCA) diagnostic test in a non-endemic area for schistosomiasis mansoni in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the findings showed false positive results and fluctuation of band intensity scores and discordant results for the same sample tested by using different POC-CCA batches. The data suggest that POC-CCA testing may not be reliable to be used as a marker for evaluation of drug response, in agreement with findings of other investigators (41)(42)(43)(44).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, the findings showed false positive results and fluctuation of band intensity scores and discordant results for the same sample tested by using different POC-CCA batches. The data suggest that POC-CCA testing may not be reliable to be used as a marker for evaluation of drug response, in agreement with findings of other investigators (41)(42)(43)(44).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Assessment of Schistosoma infection diagnosis by urinary antigen detection proved to be less suitable to be used in low and non-endemic areas because of the low accuracy of POC-CCA testing. Antigen detection assays need standardization, evaluation of performance in community and institutional settings and of reproducibility between different batches ( 14 , 41 43 ). In the present study, the findings showed false positive results and fluctuation of band intensity scores and discordant results for the same sample tested by using different POC-CCA batches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 A recent study by Graeff-Teixeira et al demonstrated unacceptably high rates of positive POC-CCA results in a nonendemic area. 51 In addition, a comparison of communities with long histories of MDA and declining prevalence measured by the KK test demonstrated major discrepancies between two batches of POC-CCA tests, thus leading to concerns about quality control and standardization by the manufacturer. 52 The POC-CCA tests used during our study were from lots 170316032 (2017), 180314027 (2018 and 2019), and 190301016 (2020); as far as we know, none has been associated with unexpected results in other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 Since our study, the format of the POC-CCA has been changed, and some issues with batch-to-batch variation have been reported. 38 This mainly applies to the very low prevalence areas in Brazil 39 ; in low-to-moderate areas, the POC-CCA provides a more accurate estimate of the true prevalence of S. mansoni compared with Kato-Katz thick smear readings. 40 Caution must always be taken with the use of different production batches of rapid diagnostic tests, comparing the performance of consecutive batches using a set of reference samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%