2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low temperature ultrasonic study of BNaOBiNb glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The α of Se‐based glasses at different ultrasonic frequencies is overall lower than that of Te‐based glasses, and the differences in the α of glasses at 10 and 30 MHz are greater than those at lower frequencies, which show that the damping effect of atomic vibration is more significant at high frequencies. That is, high‐frequency ultrasound changes the frequency of the phonon mode and disturbs the balance distribution of the thermal phonons, resulting in shorter ultrasound wavelength, weaker diffraction ability inside amorphous materials, and lager ultrasound energy loss during direct penetration 45 . Hence, the result proves that the acoustic stability of Ge 10 As 20 Te 70−y Se y glasses is relatively better than that of Ge 10 As 90− x Te x glasses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The α of Se‐based glasses at different ultrasonic frequencies is overall lower than that of Te‐based glasses, and the differences in the α of glasses at 10 and 30 MHz are greater than those at lower frequencies, which show that the damping effect of atomic vibration is more significant at high frequencies. That is, high‐frequency ultrasound changes the frequency of the phonon mode and disturbs the balance distribution of the thermal phonons, resulting in shorter ultrasound wavelength, weaker diffraction ability inside amorphous materials, and lager ultrasound energy loss during direct penetration 45 . Hence, the result proves that the acoustic stability of Ge 10 As 20 Te 70−y Se y glasses is relatively better than that of Ge 10 As 90− x Te x glasses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…That is, highfrequency ultrasound changes the frequency of the phonon mode and disturbs the balance distribution of the thermal phonons, resulting in shorter ultrasound wavelength, weaker diffraction ability inside amorphous materials, and lager ultrasound energy loss during direct penetration. 45 Hence, the result proves that the acoustic stability of Ge 10 As 20 Te 70−y Se y glasses is relatively better than that of Ge 10 As 90−x Te x glasses.…”
Section: Acoustic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 75%