2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low time resolution in schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
47
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, group differences were only found with synchronous presentation of auditory and visual stimuli. This result is contrary to our hypothesis that group differences would be obtained during the asynchronous condition due to differences in sensitivity to the temporal integration window (differences in the response to asynchrony of the AV stimuli—Foucher et al, 2007). This may indicate group differences in how gamma-band oscillations bind auditory and visual stimuli.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, group differences were only found with synchronous presentation of auditory and visual stimuli. This result is contrary to our hypothesis that group differences would be obtained during the asynchronous condition due to differences in sensitivity to the temporal integration window (differences in the response to asynchrony of the AV stimuli—Foucher et al, 2007). This may indicate group differences in how gamma-band oscillations bind auditory and visual stimuli.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we hypothesized that patients would show greater deficits in gamma-band power in response to peripheral (dorsal stream) visual stimuli relative to central (ventral stream) visual stimuli. Furthermore, multisensory studies have demonstrated that patients with schizophrenia have a wider window of integration than healthy controls when the stimuli are offset in time (Foucher et al, 2007), suggesting that HC can differentiate asynchronous stimuli with smaller delays between auditory and visual stimuli than SP. In summary, we hypothesized that SP and HC would show differential patterns of event-related gamma-band activity and these differences would vary by condition (unisensory/multisensory, near/far, and synchronous/asynchronous).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychometric functions (PFs) were sed correction after Elliott et al (2007): PFs were overall steeper (see Figure 1) and differed significantly between groups for both SB S and SB A conditions (all t > 2.0, p < .05), except for SB s between FEP and CSZ groups (t = w on those studies to show FEP patients with various diagnoses also had significantly elevated thresholds rel ls. In fact, the major finding in this study is that irrespective of diagnosis, patients having recently experienced a psychotic episode for the first time will require longer SOAs than controls and similar SOAs to st premask was found to be non-significant ( (2,56) = .865, = .427).…”
Section: Hreshold Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Some studies have found MSI deficits in patients when using complex stimuli, such as speech (de Gelder, Vroomen, Annen, Masthof, & Hodiamont, 2003; Pearl et al, 2009; Szycik et al, 2009) or socially relevant stimuli (e.g., facial expression and prosody) (de Gelder et al, 2005; de Jong, Hodiamont, Van den Stock, & de Gelder, 2009; Fiszdon & Bell, 2010). Other studies have shown that when multisensory stimuli are synchronous, MSI is intact in patients; however, when there is asynchrony between multisensory stimuli patients show deficits (e.g., Foucher, Lacambre, Pham, Giersch, & Elliott, 2007; Martin, Giersch, Huron, & van Wassenhove, 2013). Tschacher and Bergomi (2011) and Surguladze et al (2001) found evidence of intact MSI in schizophrenia patients, though these patterns were affected by levels of psychotic symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%