2015
DOI: 10.1590/1679-78251346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low-velocity Impact Response of a Nanocomposite Beam Using an Analytical Model

Abstract: Low-velocity impact of a nanocomposite beam made of glass/epoxy reinforced with multi-wall carbon nanotubes and clay nanoparticles is investigated in this study. Exerting modified rule of mixture (MROM), the mechanical properties of nanocomposite including matrix, nanoparticles or multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNT), and fiber are attained. In order to analyze the lowvelocity impact, Euler-Bernoulli beam theory and Hertz's contact law are simultaneously employed to govern the equations of motion. Using Ritz's … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for this is that L (300) has very little effect on the impact response compared to L≫10b (10*180=1800) which is the case for beam with a length-to-width ratio of (300/180=1.67). In case of beam, length-width ratio is large with L≫10b, so the length-oriented layup has a significant impact on the impact response, but the width direction is minimal [2]. Figure 6 from Table 2 shows that there are some errors in maximum contact durations (2 times of time at maximum contact force of present results and contact duration of (WPM) but the over all trend is well matched, and the maximum contact force is pretty much the same.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason for this is that L (300) has very little effect on the impact response compared to L≫10b (10*180=1800) which is the case for beam with a length-to-width ratio of (300/180=1.67). In case of beam, length-width ratio is large with L≫10b, so the length-oriented layup has a significant impact on the impact response, but the width direction is minimal [2]. Figure 6 from Table 2 shows that there are some errors in maximum contact durations (2 times of time at maximum contact force of present results and contact duration of (WPM) but the over all trend is well matched, and the maximum contact force is pretty much the same.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wuite et al [1] used the classical laminate theory to analyze nanocomposite beam and to not link them to the Hertz's contact law. Recently, Meybodi et al [2] investigated low-velocity impact response of a nanocomposite beam by using Euler-Bernoulli beam theory and Hertz's contact law. However, there has been a strong need to introduce a high-order theories to increase the accuracy of the analysis results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scanning of samples was performed at 2°min −1 . [41,42]. The inplane modulus and Poisson's ratio (v 12 ) expressions for FRP nanocomposites are given by…”
Section: Crystallographic Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, different nanoparticles or nanotubes of clays [10,16,22] alumina [11,14], silica [7,8,12,17], carbon [6,13,15,16,18] and graphene [6,20] have been added in polymer systems because of the improved mechanical properties. It was seen that all these particles improved mechanical and damage tolerance properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%