2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low Y chromosome variation in Saudi-Arabian hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas hamadryas)

Abstract: It is important to characterise the amount of variation on the mammalian Y chromosome in order to assess its potential for use in evolutionary studies. We report very low levels of polymorphism on the Y chromosome of Saudi-Arabian hamadryas baboons, Papio hamadryas hamadryas. We found no segregating sites on the Y, despite sequence analysis of 3 kb noncontiguous intron sequence in 16 males with divergent autosomal microsatellite genotypes, and a further analysis of 1.1 kb intron sequence in 97 males from four … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of alleles found at Y chromosome (19 alleles) was similar to the average for autosomal loci (20.28 averaged over eight autosomal loci, min: 8 and max: 40) and lower than the number of observed haplotypes for mtDNA (34 haplotypes). These results have parallels in studies of humans (Hurles and Jobling 2001; Kayser et al 2004) and baboons (Lawson Handley et al 2006b), where microsatellite diversity or mutation rate are similar between the Y chromosome and autosomes.…”
Section: Hierarchical Distribution Of the Genetic Variance: Strong Cosupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of alleles found at Y chromosome (19 alleles) was similar to the average for autosomal loci (20.28 averaged over eight autosomal loci, min: 8 and max: 40) and lower than the number of observed haplotypes for mtDNA (34 haplotypes). These results have parallels in studies of humans (Hurles and Jobling 2001; Kayser et al 2004) and baboons (Lawson Handley et al 2006b), where microsatellite diversity or mutation rate are similar between the Y chromosome and autosomes.…”
Section: Hierarchical Distribution Of the Genetic Variance: Strong Cosupporting
confidence: 66%
“…However, although there has been a large interest in using the Y chromosome in combination with the mtDNA or autosomal markers for resolving phylogenetic or phylogeographic issues (Braendli et al 2005; Hellborg et al 2005; Roca et al 2005; Lawson Handley et al 2006a; Yannic et al 2008a; Vega et al 2010; McDevitt et al 2011), much fewer studies have used information from the Y chromosome to explore sex‐linked differences in the microevolutionary forces shaping the fine‐scale genetic structure of populations. This is mostly explained by the lower polymorphism of the Y chromosome compared to other regions of the genome, which makes it difficult to find sufficiently variable markers for most species (International SNP Map Working Group 2001; Hellborg and Ellegren 2004; Lawson Handley et al 2006b). Studies focusing on humans (Hammer 1995; Seielstad et al 1998; Hammer et al 2003) or other primates (Eriksson et al 2006; Hammond et al 2006; Douadi et al 2007; Guschanski et al 2008) are notable exceptions due to the efforts devoted to human genetics (but see also, Flagstad et al 2003; Musiani et al 2007; Sacks et al 2008 for recent results in canids).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, we failed to find informative, polymorphic loci when screening several Y-chromosomal markers upon initiation of this study. An extremely low level of diversity on the Y-chromosome has also been described in hamadryas baboons [Lawson Handley et al, 2006 ; Städele et al, 2015 ] and is a common problem in mammalian non-model organisms [Greminger et al, 2010 ]. Still, on average, females appear to migrate more often and/or further away than males in this population of Guinea baboons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, this method obviously relies on characterizing informative sex‐specific markers, and relative lack of variability on the Y chromosome may be a limiting factor here (Hellborg & Ellegren 2004; Hammond et al . 2006; Lawson Handley et al . 2006a, b).…”
Section: Measuring Sex‐biased Dispersalmentioning
confidence: 99%