2003
DOI: 10.1067/mge.2003.308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Low yield of endoscopy in patients with persistent dyspepsia taking proton pump inhibitors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
7
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
7
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data show that referral for empirical−treatment failure does not increase the probability of finding an organic abnormality. These results are supported by Smith et al [13], who showed that the endoscopic yield in pa− tients who fail to respond to empirical treatment is significantly lower than it is in patients who showed an excellent response to PPI therapy. Furthermore, the finding that referral for alarm symptoms does not substantially contribute to finding an organ− ic abnormality (although statistically significant) is concordant with the findings of Wallace et al [10], who concluded that age and the presence of "high−risk" symptoms were both poor pre− dictors of major endoscopic lesions in their study of a very large number of patients with dyspepsia.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Our data show that referral for empirical−treatment failure does not increase the probability of finding an organic abnormality. These results are supported by Smith et al [13], who showed that the endoscopic yield in pa− tients who fail to respond to empirical treatment is significantly lower than it is in patients who showed an excellent response to PPI therapy. Furthermore, the finding that referral for alarm symptoms does not substantially contribute to finding an organ− ic abnormality (although statistically significant) is concordant with the findings of Wallace et al [10], who concluded that age and the presence of "high−risk" symptoms were both poor pre− dictors of major endoscopic lesions in their study of a very large number of patients with dyspepsia.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…So, many of the esophagitis observed should be considered refractory cases not responding to PPI. It has been suggested that the interruption of PPI for some weeks before endoscopy may improve its diagnostic sensitivity, 16,27 but this affirmation remains largely unproven.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 Finally, the role of drugs in the pathogenesis of severe esophagitis is especially controversial and has been only partially evaluated. While the use of PPIs is considered to be a protective factor, 11,16 the role of other drugs such as anticholinergics, 17 nitrates 11,18 and tricyclic antidepressants, calcium antagonists or sulcralfate 11 is more debatable. In particular, the results of studies of the effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been contradictory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical treatment of heartburn before endoscopy is currently the rule and it is well known that the prevalence of endoscopic findings is sharply reduced by previous antisecretory treatment [19]. It would be interesting to determine whether the diagnosis of severe esophagitis remains frequent under the current conditions of widespread PPI use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%