2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.spa.2017.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower bounds for moments of global scores of pairwise Markov chains

Abstract: be two random sequences so that every random variable takes values in a finite set A. We consider a global similarity score Ln := L(X 1 , . . . , Xn; Y 1 , . . . , Yn) that measures the homology (relatedness) of words (X 1 , . . . , Xn) and (Y 1 , . . . , Yn). A typical example of such score is the length of the longest common subsequence. We study the order of central absolute moment E|Ln − ELn| r in the case where the two-dimensional process (X 1 , Y 1 ), (X 2 , Y 2 ), . . . is a Markov chain on A × A. This … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within that framework, easy modifications of the tools in our approach also lead to a central limit theorem. Even more general linear lower bounds are obtained in various settings in [13] and [20] and the many references therein.…”
Section: Remark 11 (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within that framework, easy modifications of the tools in our approach also lead to a central limit theorem. Even more general linear lower bounds are obtained in various settings in [13] and [20] and the many references therein.…”
Section: Remark 11 (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PMMs with transition matrix (8) were introduced in [17] to model dependencies between two-state Markov chains, see also [18]. The model can be generalized to the case with bigger alphabets, for such a generalization with P X = P Y , see [21].…”
Section: The Related Markov Chains Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, depending on , n and N , the set (21) might well be empty. But in many instances (21) does have a positive µ 2N ·(n−1)+1 -measure, regardless of the choice of N . The following example demonstrates this.…”
Section: Barrier Set Construction Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let X = Y = {1, 2}, and assume that X and Y are Markov chains both having the transition matrix p 1 − p q 1 − q , where p, q ∈ (0, 1). Then, as is shown in[21], the transition matrix of Z…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%