1990
DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176347750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower Bounds on Bayes Factors for Multinomial Distributions, with Application to Chi-Squared Tests of Fit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bayes factors actually provide a more direct measure of the strength of evidence than do p values. (30) The polymorphisms that exhibited strong evidence of association by Bayes factors in our data were a subset of the same ones that had significant (p < 0.05) associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bayes factors actually provide a more direct measure of the strength of evidence than do p values. (30) The polymorphisms that exhibited strong evidence of association by Bayes factors in our data were a subset of the same ones that had significant (p < 0.05) associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Although several SNPs had a significant association (p < 0.05) with this PC, Bayes factors did not indicate strong evidence of association. SN-38 elimination (PC 8, k 30 in Figure 1) was associated with a SNP in the ABCC2 gene. A SNP in the SLCO1 gene and one in the ABCC1 gene had a significant association with this PC (p<0.05).…”
Section: Statistical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sedransk, Monahan, and Chiu (1985) considered estimation of multinomial probabilities under the constraint π 1 ≤ ... ≤ π k ≥ π k+1 ≥ ... ≥ π c , using a truncated Dirichlet prior and possibly a prior on k if it is unknown. Delampady and Berger (1990) derived lower bounds on Bayes factors in favor of the null hypothesis of a point multinomial probability, and related them to P -values in chi-squared tests. Bernardo and Ramón (1998) illustrated Bernardo's reference analysis approach by applying it to the problem of estimating the ratio π i /π j of two multinomial parameters.…”
Section: Bayesian Estimation Of Multinomial Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the P-value can be highly misleading as a measure of the evidence provided by the data against the null hypothesis. This was demonstrated by Edwards, Lindman and Savage (1963), Berger and Sellke (1987), Berger and Delampady (1987) and Delampady and Berger (1990) who have reviewed the practicality of the P-value and explored the dramatic conflict between the P-value and other data dependent measures of evidence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%