2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-014-0855-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower bounds on the sizes of integer programs without additional variables

Abstract: Let X be the set of integer points in some polyhedron. We investigate the smallest number of facets of any polyhedron whose set of integer points is X. This quantity, which we call the relaxation complexity of X, corresponds to the smallest number of linear inequalities of any integer program having X as the set of feasible solutions that does not use auxiliary variables. We show that the use of auxiliary variables is essential for constructing polynomial size integer programming formulations in many relevant … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As ε was arbitrary and the choices of n were infinite, this implies Theorem 1. We remark that similar strategies have been recently used by Kaibel and Weltge [7] and Kolliopoulos and Moysoglou [10].…”
Section: No Psrs In the Original Space Exists For Knapsackmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…As ε was arbitrary and the choices of n were infinite, this implies Theorem 1. We remark that similar strategies have been recently used by Kaibel and Weltge [7] and Kolliopoulos and Moysoglou [10].…”
Section: No Psrs In the Original Space Exists For Knapsackmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The second theorem, Theorem 3.14, implies that for X ⊆ Z n finite, c(X) ≤ rc(X)(2 n − 1), where rc(X) denotes the minimum number of inequalities in any system whose integer solutions are exactly X, or −∞ if there is no such system. The quantity rc(X), known as the relaxation complexity of X, was studied in [26]. A similar quantity was studied earlier in [25].…”
Section: Tighter Bounds For Specified Arrangementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Despite the fact that we do not believe that all stable set polytopes admit polynomial-size MILEFs with o(n) integer variables, another motivation for improving the lower bound is the following. In [20,Prop. 2] it is mentioned that if a family of polytopes P with vertices in {0, 1} d admits a polynomial-time algorithm to decide whether a point in {0, 1} d belongs to P , then P can be described by a MILEF whose size is polynomial in d and that uses only d integer variables.…”
Section: Towards Tight Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%