2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.83.033002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower bounds on the smallest lepton mixing angle

Abstract: We give minimal values for the smallest lepton mixing parameter jU e3 j, applying 2-loop renormalization group equations in an effective theory approach. This is relevant in scenarios that predict an inverted neutrino mass spectrum with the smallest mass and jU e3 j being zero at tree level, a situation known to be preserved at 1-loop order. At 2-loop, jU e3 j is generated at a level of 10 À12 -10 À14 . Such small values are of interest in supernova physics. Corresponding limits for the normal mass ordering ar… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the size of the Dirac Yukawa coupling O(Y ν ) ∼ m 3 M/(v sin β) 2 ≈ 0.167 is small for the adopted values m 3 = 50.1 meV and M = 10 14 GeV. If M = 10 15 GeV is chosen, the perturbativity constraint O(Y ν ) < √ 4π is still satisfied while m 1 will be enhanced by two orders of magnitude, i.e., m 1 ∼ 5.6 × 10 −9 eV. Second, the CP-violating phase δ could even be maximal at the seesaw scale such that sin 2 δ = 1, leading to the enhancement of m 1 by another order of magnitude.…”
Section: Jhep11(2021)101mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the size of the Dirac Yukawa coupling O(Y ν ) ∼ m 3 M/(v sin β) 2 ≈ 0.167 is small for the adopted values m 3 = 50.1 meV and M = 10 14 GeV. If M = 10 15 GeV is chosen, the perturbativity constraint O(Y ν ) < √ 4π is still satisfied while m 1 will be enhanced by two orders of magnitude, i.e., m 1 ∼ 5.6 × 10 −9 eV. Second, the CP-violating phase δ could even be maximal at the seesaw scale such that sin 2 δ = 1, leading to the enhancement of m 1 by another order of magnitude.…”
Section: Jhep11(2021)101mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[14]. In this connection, it is interesting to notice that a lower bound on the smallest leptonic mixing angle can also be derived [15]. Notice also that the smallest neutrino mass is denoted here by m L , which is actually m 1 in the NO case or m 3 in the IO case.…”
Section: Jhep11(2021)101mentioning
confidence: 96%