1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(98)00103-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower extremity volumetric arterial blood flow in normal subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
68
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flow rates determined in this study ( Table 1) are in good agreement with the analogous values obtained by Wehrli et al [28] and Holland et al [29]. The latter paper reported Doppler ultrasound measurements of the popliteal artery mean volume flow to be 72 mL/min (our observation, 76 mL/min).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The flow rates determined in this study ( Table 1) are in good agreement with the analogous values obtained by Wehrli et al [28] and Holland et al [29]. The latter paper reported Doppler ultrasound measurements of the popliteal artery mean volume flow to be 72 mL/min (our observation, 76 mL/min).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Small changes in intravenous pressure owing to changes in blood flow will have an effect on venous volume, and unstressed venous volume may thus decrease, as shown in the extremities using ischemic handgrip or LBNP (17,39). Basal arterial inflow to the lower limb seems to be similar in women and men (21,28), and a majority of studies have found no sex difference in arterial vasoconstriction (9,10,13,58), although men may respond with greater vasoconstriction during LBNP (7). A greater vasoconstriction in men, however, would have led to an underestimation of the differences in capacitance response in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The blood velocity was measured five times at rest, and during recovery ( Fig. 1) and calculated by integrating the outer envelope of the maximum velocity values in the flow profile (Leyk et al, 1994;Isnard et al, 1996;Robergs et al, 1997;Holland et al, 1998;Osada et al, 1999;. The average value was determined after tracing 3 or 4 clear and successive signals following cardiac cycles for this vessel at each measurement point.…”
Section: Fbf Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%