2008
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00120807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lower respiratory tract infection outcomes are predicted better by an age >80 years than by CURB-65: Fig. 1—

Abstract: Lower respiratory tract infection outcomes are predicted better by an age .80 years than by CURB-65To the Editors:In a recent issue of the European Respiratory Journal, Bont et al.[1] demonstrated that increasing age, previous hospitalisation, heart failure, diabetes, use of oral glucocorticoids, previous use of antibiotics, a diagnosis of pneumonia and an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were independent predictors of 30-day hospitalisation or death in patients with lower respiratory trac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other authors have questioned the usefulness of the CURB-65 in elderly patients because it does not assess the impact of many comorbid illnesses on mortality, and have argued that new age criteria, such as age >80 yrs, is a better predictor for poor outcomes than the more conventional of age >65 yrs. 29 Defining the contribution of age is of vital importance given the growing incidence of severe CAP among the elderly, a population most vulnerable to this deadly disease. 30 The SCAP score includes 8 variables that are contained in the CURB-65 and PSI, although it assigns different relative weights to them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors have questioned the usefulness of the CURB-65 in elderly patients because it does not assess the impact of many comorbid illnesses on mortality, and have argued that new age criteria, such as age >80 yrs, is a better predictor for poor outcomes than the more conventional of age >65 yrs. 29 Defining the contribution of age is of vital importance given the growing incidence of severe CAP among the elderly, a population most vulnerable to this deadly disease. 30 The SCAP score includes 8 variables that are contained in the CURB-65 and PSI, although it assigns different relative weights to them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data confirm this, and go further, in that they show that lowering the age cut-off in the younger population, equally, generates better predictions. TERAMOTO et al [3] suggested increasing the cut-off to 80 years in the elderly population.…”
Section: Pulmonary Infections S Ewig Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the optimal cut-off of the variable ''age'' has not been determined, and concerns have been raised about the appropriate age cut-off in the elderly population [3,4]. As it stands, the cut-off of 65 years appears arbitrary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the most frequent infections requiring hospitalization and is a leading cause of mortality in the majority of developed countries [1][2][3]. Furthermore, the hospitalized CAP mortality rate increases dramatically with age [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the hospitalized CAP mortality rate increases dramatically with age [1][2][3]. Since pneumoniarelated hospitalization and mortality are predominantly associated with older patients, the development of management strategies for pneumonia in the elderly is a priority in clinical infectious medicine and geriatric medicine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%