Evolution requires self-replication. But, what was the very first self-replicator directly ancestral to all life? The currently favoured RNA World theory assigns this role to RNA alone but suffers from a number of seemingly intractable problems. Instead, we suggest that the self-replicator consisted of both peptides and nucleic acid strands. Such a nucleopeptide replicator is more feasible both in the light of the replication machinery currently found in cells and the complexity of the evolutionary path required to reach them. Recent theoretical and mathematical work supports this idea and provide a blueprint for future investigations.
The Ancestral ReplicatorLife as we understand it is cellular. The last universal common ancestor (LUCA) of all cells (not a single cell of course but a population) is understood in some detail; it possessed a cell membrane, DNA, the basic molecular machines for copying DNA (i.e., polymerase etc.), and a functional ribosome, among many more [1]. From this highly truncated list alone it is clear that LUCA was far too complex to spontaneously assemble. It must have evolved from simpler systems, themselves able to self-replicate with some tolerance for error (otherwise they would not be able to evolve). Indeed, it is difficult to imagine that anything recognisably a cell could have spontaneous origins. This means that they in turn must have evolved from even simpler self replicators; that is, molecular selfreplicators. The first such replicator is referred to as the initial Darwinian ancestor (IDA) [2].The identity of the IDA has been cause for much speculation over the years. Nonbiological replicators such as clay crystals [3] have been invoked but are unconvincing as they require a complete takeover of one substrate with another and lack a persuasive argument to show how this could have occurred. An IDA built from biological molecules is more convincing and necessitates physicochemical conditions compatible with their formation, and with the self-replicating reaction cycle of the IDA itself. The latter likely required relatively mild conditions approaching those of analogous biochemical reactions today. There is now ample evidence that biological building blocks such as amino acids, ribose, and deoxyribose, among others, were present on the early Earth [4][5][6][7]. Potential chemistries for building block synthesis have been demonstrated, with cyanosulfidic chemistry [8] showing great promise. Furthermore, recent work has shown convincing peptide ligation in prebiotic conditions [9]. Given these findings, it now seems reasonable to assume that the IDA was constructed of components highly similar or identical to those found in life today. Indeed, such a replicator must have occurred at some stage very early in evolution even if not at the very beginning. The scene being set for an IDA constructed of biological molecules to arise, our focus turns to the main issue of this workdeciding on its identity. Three approaches will be useful to us in this endeavour. (i) Consideration of curren...