Lowering heart rate with an optimised breathing protocol for prospectively ECG-triggered CT coronary angiography

Abstract

Objectives: The aim was to prospectively characterise the effect of the level of breathhold on heart rate in CT coronary angiography (CTCA) with prospective electrocardiogram (ECG) triggering and its impact on coronary artery attenuation. Methods: 260 patients (86 women; mean age 59 ¡ 11 years) underwent 64-slice CTCA using prospective ECG triggering. Prior to CTCA, heart rates were recorded during 15 s of breath-hold at three different levels of inspiration (normal, intermediate and deep). The inspiration level with the lowest heart rate was chosen for actual CTCA scanning. Coronary artery attenuation was measured, and the presence of backflow of contrast material into the inferior vena cava (as an indicator of increased intrathoracic pressure) was recorded. Results: The mean heart rate at breath-hold was significantly different for the three inspiration levels (normal, 60 ¡ 8 bpm; intermediate, 59 ¡ 8 bpm; deep, 57 ¡ 7 bpm; p,0.001). The maximum heart rate reduction in each patient at breath-hold averaged 5.3 ¡ 5.1 bpm, and was observed at a normal inspiration depth in 23 (9%) patients, at an intermediate inspiration depth in 102 (39%) patients and at deep inspiration in 135 (52%) patients. Overall, there was no association between the level of breath-hold and coronary vessel attenuation (p-value was not significant). However, the backflow of contrast material into the inferior vena cava (n526) was found predominantly at deep inspiration levels (p,0.001), and, when it occurred, it was associated with reduced coronary attenuation compared with patients with no backflow (p,0.05). Conclusion: The breath-hold level to best reduce heart rate for CTCA should be individually assessed prior to scanning because a mean heart rate reduction of 5 bpm can be achieved. Low-dose CT coronary angiography (CTCA) with prospective electrocardiogram (ECG) triggering has recently been introduced [1] and shown to offer a tremendous reduction in radiation dose [2-8], which makes its widespread clinical use feasible. Scanning in CTCA with prospective ECG triggering is exclusively performed during a short phase in diastole, called \diastasis". The new technique appears to be more prone to artefacts caused by coronary motion. This is especially true in higher heart rates because diastasis disproportionally shortens with increasing heart rates [9] and the length of diastasis becomes shorter than the time required for image acquisition when the heart rate exceeds a certain threshold. Furthermore, when low-dose CTCA with prospective ECG triggering is performed with the smallest possible acquisition window to achieve the lowest possible radiation dose, it does not permit image reconstruction in other phases of the cardiac cycle to compensate for a possible reduction in image quality. An aggressive reduction in heart rate with b-blockers below a target heart rate of 63 bpm appears to be a prerequisite for lowdose CTCA [2,10].CTCA is generally performed during the patient's breath-hold to avoid motion artefacts caused by movement of the thora...

Congenital coronary anomalies detected by coronary computed tomography compared to invasive coronary angiography

“…A single dose of 2.5 mg isosorbiddinitrate sublingual (Isoket, Schwarz Pharma, Monheim, Germany) was also applied prior to the scan. All patients were carefully monitored during the examination to assure that breathing commands were adequately followed [12]. All images were transferred to an external workstation (AW 4.4, GE Healthcare) for image reconstruction and evaluation.…”

Fat volume measurements as a predictor of image noise in coronary computed tomography angiography

“…The accuracy of CCTA is adversely affected by many factors that can degrade the image quality; these include patient-related factors such as heart rate variation that induces motion artifacts [16], [17], [18], blooming artifacts owing to excess coronary calcification [19], and increased image noise as a result of high BMI [20], [21].…”

Normative Computed Tomography Angiography Values of the Aortic Root, Aorta and Aortic arch in Children

“…Some of these subjects had diagnostic studies but the image quality may not have been adequate for our study purpose as such they were excluded. Subjects less than 6 years requiring coronary artery evaluation were often anesthetized and intubated for better heart rate and respiratory control to avoid motion artifacts 24 . The location of the peripheral intravenous (PIV) access was determined by the imaging question.…”