2009
DOI: 10.1136/ip.2008.021501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lowering the default speed limit in residential areas: opportunities for policy influence and the role of public health professionals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower speeds have been found to be associated with fewer and less severe injuries (Elvik, 2005;Rosén et al, 2011), improved resident perceptions and social interactions (Appleyard, 1980), increased walking and cycling levels (Jacobsen, Racioppi, and Rutter, 2009) and reduced traffic noise impact (Freitas et al, 2012). The ability to introduce 20 mph speed limits over wider geographical areas, given that it is a much less costly intervention than traffic-calmed 20 mph speed zones, means that there is significant potential to address injury, environmental sustainability and wider public health goals at a town and city level (Pilkington, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower speeds have been found to be associated with fewer and less severe injuries (Elvik, 2005;Rosén et al, 2011), improved resident perceptions and social interactions (Appleyard, 1980), increased walking and cycling levels (Jacobsen, Racioppi, and Rutter, 2009) and reduced traffic noise impact (Freitas et al, 2012). The ability to introduce 20 mph speed limits over wider geographical areas, given that it is a much less costly intervention than traffic-calmed 20 mph speed zones, means that there is significant potential to address injury, environmental sustainability and wider public health goals at a town and city level (Pilkington, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mostly speed limit in the city area were reduced. Research in these countries has found reductions in speeds and crashes [45][46][47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advocates of 20mph limits argue they are a mechanism for redefining urban spaces as pleasant places to live rather than as 'roads for cars' (Tranter 2010). Evidence from small scale 20mph or 30kph zones (zones are traffic calmed; this paper is concerned with signs-only 20mph limits) indicates how low traffic speeds can encourage higher community benefits in health, wellbeing and social capital (Dorling 2014;McCabe, Schoneman and Arcaya 2013;Elvik 2012;Pilkington 2009), and encouragement of healthier and more sustainable transport modes such as walking and cycling (Cohen, Boniface and Watkins 2014). Zones can also deliver impressive speed reductions and associated road danger reduction: Grundy, Steinbach, Edwards, Green, Armstrong and Wilkinson's (2009) review of 20mph zones in London calculated a 40% reduction in casualties, while Pilkington's earlier (2000) review of 20mph zones demonstrated an average speed reduction of 9.3mph and an associated reduction in crashes of 60%.…”
Section: The Rise Of 20mph and 30kph Limits: Policy And Practice Contextmentioning
confidence: 98%