1995
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(95)76861-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lowfat Ice Creams from Freeze-Concentrated Versus Heat-Concentrated Nonfat Milk Solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pridiville et al (1999) tested hardness of ice cream with 4 selected fat contents and reported that full-fat ice cream was significantly harder than reduced-fat ice creams. Moreover, lowfat vanilla ice cream made from ice cream mix containing freeze-concentrated nonfat milk solids (NMS) was smoother in texture, firmer in body, and slower to melt than lowfat ice cream of equivalent composition but made from heat-concentrated skim milk or NMS because the proteins in the heatconcentrated NMS were denatured more during manufacture than the proteins in the freeze-concentrated NMS (Garcia et al, 1995). Because partially denatured proteins often exhibit substantial hydrophobic interactions, the structure of the continuous phase is strengthened, resulting in increased amounts of bound water (Harper and Mangino, 2007).…”
Section: Hardness Determination Of Lowfat Ice Creammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pridiville et al (1999) tested hardness of ice cream with 4 selected fat contents and reported that full-fat ice cream was significantly harder than reduced-fat ice creams. Moreover, lowfat vanilla ice cream made from ice cream mix containing freeze-concentrated nonfat milk solids (NMS) was smoother in texture, firmer in body, and slower to melt than lowfat ice cream of equivalent composition but made from heat-concentrated skim milk or NMS because the proteins in the heatconcentrated NMS were denatured more during manufacture than the proteins in the freeze-concentrated NMS (Garcia et al, 1995). Because partially denatured proteins often exhibit substantial hydrophobic interactions, the structure of the continuous phase is strengthened, resulting in increased amounts of bound water (Harper and Mangino, 2007).…”
Section: Hardness Determination Of Lowfat Ice Creammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of melted ice cream collected in the cup was weighed every 5 min over a period of 60 min. The slope of the line plotted for melted mass (g) against time (min) represented the melting rate of the ice cream samples (Gracia et al, 1995;Alvarez et al, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lipolytic and Proteolytic bacterial count: was carried out as described by Chalmers (1962) Coliform bacteria: was determined according to the method described in the American public Health Association (A.P.H.A., 1960) Organoleptic properties of ice cream: The parameters evaluated were Flavour (50 points), body & texture (40 points), and melting quality (10 points) according by Fathi and Fatma (1999). Melting Resistance (Meltdown) %: was carried out according to Garcia, et al, (1995), Overrun calculation: According to Sommar, (1951), Rheological tests according to (Chandrasekhara et al, 1957) .in ice cream Curd tension: is determined by using the method of (Chandrasekhara et al, 1957).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%