1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4290(98)00109-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lowland rice improvement in northern and northeast Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
5
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with previous studies (Schnier et al, 1990;Peng et al, 1996;Khunthasuvon et al, 1998;Haefele et al, 2008). This is in line with previous studies (Schnier et al, 1990;Peng et al, 1996;Khunthasuvon et al, 1998;Haefele et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is in line with previous studies (Schnier et al, 1990;Peng et al, 1996;Khunthasuvon et al, 1998;Haefele et al, 2008). This is in line with previous studies (Schnier et al, 1990;Peng et al, 1996;Khunthasuvon et al, 1998;Haefele et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The results of ANOVA indicated that the response of grain yield to fertilizer application was consistent across environments, and was not aff ected by water availability, soil properties, or establishment methods. This is in line with previous studies (Schnier et al, 1990;Peng et al, 1996;Khunthasuvon et al, 1998;Haefele et al, 2008). Khunthasuvon et al (1998) and Haefele et al (2008) indicated that without severe water stress, grain yield of lowland rice could be improved through increased nutrient availability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiple regression analysis on the factors of SOC content (g kg-I), growth duration (GD, days) and the amount of N fertilizer (N, g m-2 ) explained 71 % of the variation of rice biomass (RB, g m-2 ) and 67% of that of yield (RY, g m-2 ) at each field, as shown in the following regression equations: RB= 20.2 X SOC+49.0 X N + 11.9 X GD-1022 R2=0.71 (standardized: RB* = 0.31 X SOC* + 0.26 X N* +0.62 X GD*) RY=6.15 xSOC+27.6 X N +3.37 X GD-293 R2=0.67 (standardized: RY*=0.27xSOC*+0.42xN* +0.51 XGD*) Agronomic efficiency of nitrogen (yield increase per unit applied nitrogen) estimated from the multiple regression analysis was 27.6 g g-I and similar to those experimentally obtained in Northeast Thailand (Khunthasuvon et al, 1998;Ohnishi et al, 1999). The regression equations suggest that the differences in the rice biomass and yield between the SOC-richest field and the SOC-poorest field were 410 and 130 g m-2 , respectively, even when the transplanting date and fertilizer application rate were the same.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Not only could more crops be planted, water availability would facilitate effective use of other agricultural inputs such as fertilizers, pesticides and improved crop varieties, also leading to higher crop productivity and production. Use of such inputs in conditions of water stress may not improve yields and can even be counterproductive (Khunthasuvon et al, 1998).…”
Section: Exploiting the Nexus Between Groundwater And Agriculture In mentioning
confidence: 99%