1982
DOI: 10.1109/tassp.1982.1163867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LPC distance measures and statistical tests with particular reference to the likelihood ratio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both these statistics start to grow when a jump has occured, and again the task of the stopping rule is to decide whether the growth is significant. Some other proposed distance measures, in the context of speech processing, are listed in de Souza and Thomson (1982). These two statistics are evaluated on a number of real speech data sets in Andre-Obrecht (1988) for the growing window approach.…”
Section: The Divergence Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both these statistics start to grow when a jump has occured, and again the task of the stopping rule is to decide whether the growth is significant. Some other proposed distance measures, in the context of speech processing, are listed in de Souza and Thomson (1982). These two statistics are evaluated on a number of real speech data sets in Andre-Obrecht (1988) for the growing window approach.…”
Section: The Divergence Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several tests have been proposed for use in segmentation algorithms. de Souza and Thomson [1982] derived a test based on a likelihood ratio statistic, which is insensitive to changes in spectral magnitude but sensitive to changes in spectral shape. This test statistic has an asymptotic chi‐square distribution with n degrees of freedom under the null hypothesis of no changes in the AR parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first stage, a preliminary boundary is detected after the change point; the optimal boundary is then searched in the second stage. Lovell and Boashash [1987] adopted the segmentation procedure of Appel and Brandt [1983], but replaced the test derived by de Souza and Thomson [1982]. Lovell and Boashash [1987] maintained that variations in the spectral magnitude are largely due to the measuring instrument, so they designed the segmentation algorithm to determine segments according to changes in the spectral shape alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simulations in [ 2 ] show that Dds is a powerful, symmetric distance measure and is insensitive to changes in signal energy levels. Dds may be used to replace Dab in the Appel and Brandt algorithm but it does not identify the segment boundaries as precisely [ S I .…”
Section: S(tf)mentioning
confidence: 99%