2019 IEEE Colombian Conference on Communications and Computing (COLCOM) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/colcomcon.2019.8809160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LSTM and Convolution Networks exploration for Parkinson’s Diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Around half of the included studies used convolution neural networks ( n = 37); afterward, other neural networks ( n = 31) were implemented in the included studies, followed by artificial neural networks (ANNs) ( n = 10), recurrent neural networks (RNNs) ( n = 9), and fuzzy neural networks (FNNs), as shown in Table 3 . In the end, the most imitated neural network architecture in the included studies was LSTM ( n = 11) [ 6 , 34 , 36 , 38 , 40 , 65 , 70 , 74 , 77 , 80 , 83 ], VGG ( n = 3) [ 18 , 27 , 58 ], and DNN ( n = 6) [ 34 , 35 , 60 , 91 , 92 , 103 ]. Recently, with the developments of new techniques such as convolutional neural network [ 101 ] and transfer learning [ 63 ], deep learning gained significant advances in the computer vision tasks, e.g., ImageNet [ 77 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Around half of the included studies used convolution neural networks ( n = 37); afterward, other neural networks ( n = 31) were implemented in the included studies, followed by artificial neural networks (ANNs) ( n = 10), recurrent neural networks (RNNs) ( n = 9), and fuzzy neural networks (FNNs), as shown in Table 3 . In the end, the most imitated neural network architecture in the included studies was LSTM ( n = 11) [ 6 , 34 , 36 , 38 , 40 , 65 , 70 , 74 , 77 , 80 , 83 ], VGG ( n = 3) [ 18 , 27 , 58 ], and DNN ( n = 6) [ 34 , 35 , 60 , 91 , 92 , 103 ]. Recently, with the developments of new techniques such as convolutional neural network [ 101 ] and transfer learning [ 63 ], deep learning gained significant advances in the computer vision tasks, e.g., ImageNet [ 77 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical studies can refer to a video recorded for the patient while performing physical activities such as a PD bed test. As mentioned, in [ 18 , 43 , 70 , 87 ], a neural network was able to identify the symptoms of PD through a video sample of the patient. In the future, the clinical studies may analyze any video recorded in the hospital for other patients, for example, during therapy sessions, and predict if this patient is suspected of having PD in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven machine learning algorithms were chosen based on the results of previous studies (Urcuqui et al, 2018 ; Reyes et al, 2019 ; Alzubaidi et al, 2021 ). Six of the selected algorithms were trained using R statistical software (logistic regression, decision tree without processing, pre-pruning decision tree, post-pruning decision tree, naive Bayes, and random forest).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, postural and kinematic features are extracted from videos that are recorded while PD patients and healthy controls are walking, to discriminate them. In [109,110], ANNs are trained with signals collected via the Microsoft Kinect (MS Kinect) sensors to diagnose PD. In [109], the combination of a CNN with an LSTM outperforms the standalone CNN and LSTM classifiers, reaching up to 83.1% accuracy, while in [110], the ANN classifier outperforms the SVM model, with 89.4% accuracy.…”
Section: Image and Depth Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [109,110], ANNs are trained with signals collected via the Microsoft Kinect (MS Kinect) sensors to diagnose PD. In [109], the combination of a CNN with an LSTM outperforms the standalone CNN and LSTM classifiers, reaching up to 83.1% accuracy, while in [110], the ANN classifier outperforms the SVM model, with 89.4% accuracy. In the last study, besides gait data, features extracted from finger-and foot-tapping activities have been evaluated, without however improving the classification performance.…”
Section: Image and Depth Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%