2022
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2022.3183389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LSTM-Autoencoder Network for the Detection of Seismic Electric Signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We tested the performances based on different models, including the proposed MagInfoNet, MagNet, RF, and the MINLSTM where LSTM layers (Xue et al., 2022) are used instead of UniMP layers to compare the performance between the GNN and BRNN. Instead of only selecting samples at epicentral distances of less than 1° (Mousavi & Beroza, 2020), we did not make any redundant selective reservation and other filter operations so that the experimental results can reveal the generalization ability and broader scope of application of MagInfoNet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tested the performances based on different models, including the proposed MagInfoNet, MagNet, RF, and the MINLSTM where LSTM layers (Xue et al., 2022) are used instead of UniMP layers to compare the performance between the GNN and BRNN. Instead of only selecting samples at epicentral distances of less than 1° (Mousavi & Beroza, 2020), we did not make any redundant selective reservation and other filter operations so that the experimental results can reveal the generalization ability and broader scope of application of MagInfoNet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings have positioned the geoelectric method as one of the most promising geophysical approaches for achieving breakthroughs in short-term earthquake prediction (Zhao et al 2022). Some researchers have tried to conduct earthquake forecasting by analyzing pre-earthquake geoelectric signals (Varotsos & Lazaridou 1991;Uyeda et al 2000Uyeda et al , 2009Du et al 2002;An et al 2013;Xue et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning (ML) applied to geophysical problems is a cutting-edge direction [33]. In recent years, ML has been utilized in many geophysics application areas, including pattern recognition in seismic attributes [34], noise removal [35,36], and inversion tasks [8,[37][38][39][40]. As a representative of the ML, the deep learning (DL) network comes with strong learning and generalization capabilities, enabling excellent performance in electrical resistivity inversion problems [41][42][43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%