2015
DOI: 10.12668/jsij.5.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<b>A Study of Social Innovation Concepts: A Japanese Perspective </b>

Abstract: This article reviews concepts of social innovation and some Japanese cases. Social innovation seeks to provide a broad perspective on innovation that is not only premised on technology, and offers much potential for tackling complex emerging social issues. Evidenced-based discourse on social innovations and a more detailed policy framework are urgently needed to enable positive changes in the society we live in.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gerometta et al (2005), Prigulny (2007), Kotelnikova (2012), Burns and Krampf (2015), Kirko et al (2012), Glor (2015a;2015b), Baker and Mehmood (2015), Baumgarten (1975) research the methodology of innovation and try to define its varieties and types. Taylor, (1970), Carlson et al (1971), Zhuravskaya (2008), Fujisawa et al (2015), Kuehlwein and Rosen (1993) look into the foundations of systemic analysis of innovation, including systemic component, systemic structural, and systemic functional approaches. An article by Kroytor (2011) suggests the unique concept of studying innovation on three levels: societal, institutional, and personal.…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gerometta et al (2005), Prigulny (2007), Kotelnikova (2012), Burns and Krampf (2015), Kirko et al (2012), Glor (2015a;2015b), Baker and Mehmood (2015), Baumgarten (1975) research the methodology of innovation and try to define its varieties and types. Taylor, (1970), Carlson et al (1971), Zhuravskaya (2008), Fujisawa et al (2015), Kuehlwein and Rosen (1993) look into the foundations of systemic analysis of innovation, including systemic component, systemic structural, and systemic functional approaches. An article by Kroytor (2011) suggests the unique concept of studying innovation on three levels: societal, institutional, and personal.…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social innovations are much accepted in Japanese society. They are often driven by formal Japanese corporations such as OMRON Taiyo Home Co., Ltd. with initiative coming from the corporations (Fujisawa et al, 2015), or by social enterprise, such as Hokkaido Green Fund (HGF) for the development of energy business from stakeholders' perspective (Tanimoto, 2012).…”
Section: Context Of Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, social innovation is also (slowly) taking off in Japan, as there is a rise in new types of enterprises, cooperatives, and organizations, especially NGOs, which aim to foster awareness, education, and social solutions for diverse issues (Fujisawa et al 2015). Other work shows that the various types of new, innovative businesses and collaborations are becoming increasingly diverse (Toivonen 2013;2016), and that social innovation practices are successfully utilized by local governments to revitalize public places and urban communities (Ishigaki and Sashida 2013;Martinus 2014).…”
Section: Conceptual Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%