2018
DOI: 10.1159/000492742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<b><i>TMEM18</i></b>: A Novel Prognostic Marker in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Abstract: Background: Certain nuclear envelope proteins are associated with important cancer cell characteristics, including migration and proliferation. Abnormal expression of and genetic changes in nuclear envelope proteins have been reported in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Transmembrane protein 18 (TMEM18), a nuclear envelope protein, is involved in neural stem cell migration and tumorigenicity. Methods: To examine the prognostic significance of TMEM18 in AML patients, we analyzed an AML cohort from The Can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The traditional prognostic factors (age, gender, ELN2017 risk stratification, etc) and the associated expression data (predicted LINC00649 binding proteins, miRNAs/mRNAs in the ceRNA network), and methylation data (altered methylated CpG sites) were included into the prediction model, by which the OS and PFS data were fitted into using the LASSO regression analysis. A few prediction models, including genetic information of AML patients, have been developed previously, including Clinseq-G [ 82 ] (AUC for 3-year OS is 0.730), ELN2017 stratification in the validation cohort [ 82 ] (AUC for 3-year OS is 0.65), Li Z et al [ 82 ] (AUC for 3-year OS is 0.70), Huang R et al [ 83 ] (AUC for 1 year OS is 0.666, AUC for 5 year OS is 0.707), Ha M et al [ 84 ] (AUC for 5-year OS is 0.613). The AUC of our prediction models is better than all these models, possibly attributing to the integrated multi-dimension information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional prognostic factors (age, gender, ELN2017 risk stratification, etc) and the associated expression data (predicted LINC00649 binding proteins, miRNAs/mRNAs in the ceRNA network), and methylation data (altered methylated CpG sites) were included into the prediction model, by which the OS and PFS data were fitted into using the LASSO regression analysis. A few prediction models, including genetic information of AML patients, have been developed previously, including Clinseq-G [ 82 ] (AUC for 3-year OS is 0.730), ELN2017 stratification in the validation cohort [ 82 ] (AUC for 3-year OS is 0.65), Li Z et al [ 82 ] (AUC for 3-year OS is 0.70), Huang R et al [ 83 ] (AUC for 1 year OS is 0.666, AUC for 5 year OS is 0.707), Ha M et al [ 84 ] (AUC for 5-year OS is 0.613). The AUC of our prediction models is better than all these models, possibly attributing to the integrated multi-dimension information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the obvious correlation and dependency between each variable, the traditional multivariable Cox analysis is of limited utility, where the Lasso-Cox methods showed its superiority. A few prediction models for AML overall survival have been reported (Table 3), including Huang R et al [73], Mihyang Ha et al [74], Clinseq-G model [75], ELN2017 recommendation [75], Zejuan Li et al [75]. The AUC equals to the probability, which a diagnostic classifier will rank a randomly chosen positive instance higher than a negative one, and the highest AUC is established as best practice [76].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the obvious correlation and dependency between each variable, the traditional multivariable Cox analysis is of limited utility, where the Lasso-Cox methods showed its superiority. A few prediction models for AML overall survival have been reported (Table 3), including Huang R et al (75), Mihyang Ha et al (76), Clinseq-G model(77), ELN2017 recommendation(77), Zejuan Li et al (77). The AUC equals to the probability, which a diagnostic classi er will rank a randomly chosen positive instance higher than a negative one, and the highest AUC is established as best practice (78).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%