Purpose
To evaluate the accuracy of various claimsâbased definitions of diabetesârelated complications (coronary artery disease [CAD], heart failure, cerebrovascular disease and dialysis).
Methods
We evaluated data on 1379 inpatients who received care at the Niigata University Medical & Dental Hospital in September 2018. Manual electronic medical chart reviews were conducted for all patients with regard to diabetesârelated complications and were used as the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of each claimsâbased definition associated with diabetesârelated complications based on Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC), International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICDâ10) codes, procedure codes and medication codes were calculated.
Results
DPCâbased definitions had higher sensitivity, specificity, and PPV than ICDâ10 code definitions for CAD and cerebrovascular disease, with sensitivity of 0.963â1.000 and 0.905â0.952, specificity of 1.000 and 1.000, and PPV of 1.000 and 1.000, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and PPV were high using procedure codes for CAD and dialysis, with sensitivity of 0.963 and 1.000, specificity of 1.000 and 1.000, and PPV of 1.000 and 1.000, respectively. DPC and/or ICDâ10 codesâ+âmedication were better for heart failure than the ICDâ10 code definition, with sensitivity of 0.933, specificity of 1.000, and PPV of 1.000. The PPVs were lower than 60% for all diabetesârelated complications using ICDâ10 codes only.
Conclusion
The DPCâbased definitions for CAD and cerebrovascular disease, procedure codes for CAD and dialysis, and DPC or ICDâ10 codes with medication codes for heart failure could accurately identify these diabetesârelated complications from claims databases.