2023
DOI: 10.1159/000535148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<i>MTNR1B</i> rs1387153 Polymorphism and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

Dan Shan,
Ao Wang,
Ke Yi

Abstract: Introduction: Published data on the association between the MTNR1B rs1387153 polymorphism and gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM) risk are controversial. A meta-analysis was performed to assess whether the polymorphism of MTNR1B rs1387153 is associated with GDM risk. Methods: Medline, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Chinese Biomedicine Databases were searched to identify eligible studies. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for MTNR1B rs1387153 polymorphism and GDM … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The placental expression level of MT2 in GDM women carrying the GG and GC genotypes was higher than in those carrying the CC genotype [95]. SNPs rs1387153 (C > T) allele T and rs10830962 (C > G) allele G are both located in the intergenic region over 2 kb upstream from MTNR1B and demonstrated a significant association with an increased risk of GDM [96,[98][99][100][101]. Notably, maternal rs10830963 (C > G) had an association with offspring birth weight [13,102].…”
Section: Mtnr1bmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The placental expression level of MT2 in GDM women carrying the GG and GC genotypes was higher than in those carrying the CC genotype [95]. SNPs rs1387153 (C > T) allele T and rs10830962 (C > G) allele G are both located in the intergenic region over 2 kb upstream from MTNR1B and demonstrated a significant association with an increased risk of GDM [96,[98][99][100][101]. Notably, maternal rs10830963 (C > G) had an association with offspring birth weight [13,102].…”
Section: Mtnr1bmentioning
confidence: 95%