2019
DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s215729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p>Beyond The T/C Ratio: Old And New Anticancer Activity Scores In Vivo</p>

Abstract: Assessing the efficacy of anticancer agents in animal models remains a necessary step in the development of new treatment options and plays an important role in their optimization and comparison. Often, however, interpretation of the results is flawed by excessive trust in scores traditionally handed down, but whose origin and limitations have been lost. Here I examine the theories and assumptions underlying the most common rating scales, suggesting improvements to the old scores and proposing the adoption of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tumour delay (T − C): This is calculated by the differences in time (in days) to reach 30% of its initial tumour volume in both groups (treated and control groups). 31 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumour delay (T − C): This is calculated by the differences in time (in days) to reach 30% of its initial tumour volume in both groups (treated and control groups). 31 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of the experiment, mice were sacrificed, then tumours and livers were excised, measured and stored for further analysis. The treatment efficacy was calculated as the percentage of tumour growth (%Gr = 100 × ∆T/∆C, where ∆T = T − T 0 and ∆C= C − C 0 ) and the percentage of growth inhibition (%GrI = 100 − %Gr) according to [58].…”
Section: Animal Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2D). Interestingly, however, in terms of tumor regression, the impact of DCF treatment was more profound in PreNAC-O than in PostNAC-O xenografts, with tumor growth inhibition rates (TGIs) 10,11 of 58.5% and 35.9%, respectively. Furthermore, even though the growth rate of PostNAC-O xenografts was signi cantly suppressed by DCF treatment, it was still comparable to that in the PreNAC-O xenograft control group (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%