2020
DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s275006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p>Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Reliability Testing of Chinese Version of the Living with Medicines Questionnaire in Elderly Patients with Chronic Diseases</p>

Abstract: Background The Living with Medicines Questionnaire (LMQ-3) is a reliable, valid instrument used to assess the medication-related burden of patients with chronic disease using long-term medication, but it has not been used in China. Purpose To translate and cross-culturally adapt the LMQ-3 into Chinese and assess its reliability and validity among elderly patients with chronic disease. Methods After translation and back-translation, views from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study used the C-LMQ-3 translated by the team of this study [ 26 ], which consisted of 39 items in eight domains (i.e., relationships with health professionals, practicalities, interferences, effectiveness, side effects, concerns, cost and autonomy, scored at a 5-point scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree). Total LMQ-3 scores range from 39 to 195; higher scores indicate greater burden associated with medicine use.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study used the C-LMQ-3 translated by the team of this study [ 26 ], which consisted of 39 items in eight domains (i.e., relationships with health professionals, practicalities, interferences, effectiveness, side effects, concerns, cost and autonomy, scored at a 5-point scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree). Total LMQ-3 scores range from 39 to 195; higher scores indicate greater burden associated with medicine use.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated from existing studies, the tool exhibits high reliability and effectiveness, and has been employed in numerous nations (e.g., Australia, Belgium, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Qatar and the United Kingdom) [ 22 – 25 ]. Furthermore, the instrument has also been translated and validated for use in an elderly Chinese population- the C-LMQ-3 [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of burden was categorized as: minimal (39–105), moderate (106–121), and high (122–195). 18 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and categorical variables are presented as percentages (n [%]). The content validity of the C-NEQ was evaluated by our expert team including five experts using the four-point scale from 1 (not relevant) to 4 (highly relevant), to assess the content effectiveness index (I-CVI) and scale content effectiveness index (S-CVI) as previously [ 14 ]. Items with I-CVI =1 and S-CVI values > 0.8 were accepted as indicating relevant content.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%