2019
DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s204844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p>Effects of PEGylation on capture of dextran-coated magnetic nanoparticles in microcirculation</p>

Abstract: Background Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) can be localized against hemodynamic forces in blood vessels with the application of an external magnetic field. In addition, PEGylation of nanoparticles may increase the half-life of nanocomposites in circulation. In this work, we examined the effect of PEGylation on the magnetic capture of MNPs in vivo. Methods Laser speckle contrast imaging and capillaroscopy were used to assess the magnetic capture of dextran-coated MNPs and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only IML pegylation induced a slight increase on their hemolysis capacity (1% to~2%), although within the normal range of hemolysis that is considered biocompatible (0-2%) [47]. Our results are in agreement with the findings of other authors, who documented that pegylation reduced blood proteins binding [48] such as BSA and IgG [49] improving the dispersibility of the nanoparticles and reducing their interactions [50]. On the other hand, pegylation also significantly reduce the interaction between the nanoformulations and the reticuloendothelial system cells such as lymphocytes and macrophages [49,51].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only IML pegylation induced a slight increase on their hemolysis capacity (1% to~2%), although within the normal range of hemolysis that is considered biocompatible (0-2%) [47]. Our results are in agreement with the findings of other authors, who documented that pegylation reduced blood proteins binding [48] such as BSA and IgG [49] improving the dispersibility of the nanoparticles and reducing their interactions [50]. On the other hand, pegylation also significantly reduce the interaction between the nanoformulations and the reticuloendothelial system cells such as lymphocytes and macrophages [49,51].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In terms of cell internalization, it is well documented that SPIONs can accumulate in large amounts inside the cell, both in cancer cells and in normal cells [61,62]. Our hypothesis is that the coating and functionalization of the nanoformulations increase their hydrophilicity and therefore their dispersion [63], and reduce the interactions between particles [50], allowing a greater number of nanoformulations to be available for cell internalization, which previously remained agglutinated. A greater amount of NPs (and thus, also iron) inside the cell increases migration capacity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“… 38 , 39 In the presence of plasma proteins as in the culture medium, positive or negative ζ-potentials of nanoparticles tend to become sheltered, which may contribute to further increase in the size of the aggregates. 40 Our results are consistent with previous findings that PLL-MNPs with positive or negative ζ-potentials exhibited similar pattern of interaction with glioma cells in culture. 31 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Application of magnetic field gradient may capture or manipulate MNPs, allowing “magnetic targeting” in drug delivery. In preclinical studies, simply using an NdFeB magnet may generate magnetic force enough to drag MNPs in circulation against hemodynamic forces in bigger artery with an emboli [24] or microvessels [25]. A magnetic field strength of 0.24 to 0.44 T has been used in animal models to induce magnetic targeting [24,26].…”
Section: Targeting Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%