2019
DOI: 10.2147/ott.s210103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p>Fasting blood glucose levels and prognosis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective cohort study in China</p>

Abstract: Purpose Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most diagnosed lung cancer and is associated with poor prognosis. This study aimed to analyze whether fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels could provide prognostic information in Chinese patients with NSCLC, using the Suzhou Lung Cancer Survival study. Patients and methods A prospective cohort study of adult patients with primary NSCLC was performed. The patients who were hospitalized between January 2016 and April 2018 in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wu et al conducted a study that included 306 stage 0-III esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy and found that low postoperative FBG was related to poor survival, and an FBG ≤4 mmol/L was independently linked to poor survival [16]. In our study, we selected patients without a background of a prior preoperative aberrant FBG and found that a low postoperative FBG (<5.11 mmol/L) was associated with poor survival for CRC, which was partially consistent with the results of these studies [16,23]. Notably, we also found that 58.75% (47/80) of patients maintained a relatively high FBG compared to their preoperative value at the 3-6 m follow-up, but FBG failed to present any prognostic value for DFS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wu et al conducted a study that included 306 stage 0-III esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy and found that low postoperative FBG was related to poor survival, and an FBG ≤4 mmol/L was independently linked to poor survival [16]. In our study, we selected patients without a background of a prior preoperative aberrant FBG and found that a low postoperative FBG (<5.11 mmol/L) was associated with poor survival for CRC, which was partially consistent with the results of these studies [16,23]. Notably, we also found that 58.75% (47/80) of patients maintained a relatively high FBG compared to their preoperative value at the 3-6 m follow-up, but FBG failed to present any prognostic value for DFS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…carried out a prospective cohort study with 387 stage I-IV NSCLC patients and found that patients with a low FBG (<4 mmol/L) had a significantly higher risk of death than those with a high FBG [23]. Wu et al conducted a study that included 306 stage 0-III esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy and found that low postoperative FBG was related to poor survival, and an FBG ≤4 mmol/L was independently linked to poor survival [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards metabolic risks (high-fasting plasma glucose level), the prognosis in female patients showed an increasing trend, whereas that of males was stable. Metabolic risk-related [ 44 ] ASDR increased in most regions, indicating fasting glucose level elevated TBL cancer death. Some studies provided evidence that diabetes correlated with an elevated risk of lung cancer mortality [ 45 , 46 ], and baseline fasting plasma glucose level was an independent predictor of lung cancer survival [ 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding blood glucose, although there is no clear evidence that it is related to increased risk, it's well known that cancer cells prefer to metabolize glucose by Warburg effect [38]. Additionally, a study showed that low FBG levels and diabetes were associated wth poor survival in patientsits with lung cancer [39]. Moreover, a case-cohort study of Finnish men inferred that higher fasting serum insulin concentrations, as well as the presence of insulin resistance, appear to be associated with an elevated risk of lung cancer development [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%