2020
DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s275422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p>Nomogram to Predict Preoperative Occult Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) Based on Imaging and Inflammatory Indexes</p>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, the known factors associated with prognosis are tumor size, site, nuclear split phase count, tumor rupture, positive cut margins, KIT 11 exon deletion mutations, and other adverse biological behaviors ( 11 15 ). The Fletcher classification criteria and the Miettinen-Lasotar classification criteria (also known as AFIP risk assessment) have been used clinically as risk assessment for GISTs, the former classifying four grades of very low, low, medium and high risk with only two indicators of tumor size and nuclear split phase count, the latter adding tumor primary site to tumor size and nuclear split phase count parameter indexes and introduced a comprehensive scoring method to classify them ( 16 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the known factors associated with prognosis are tumor size, site, nuclear split phase count, tumor rupture, positive cut margins, KIT 11 exon deletion mutations, and other adverse biological behaviors ( 11 15 ). The Fletcher classification criteria and the Miettinen-Lasotar classification criteria (also known as AFIP risk assessment) have been used clinically as risk assessment for GISTs, the former classifying four grades of very low, low, medium and high risk with only two indicators of tumor size and nuclear split phase count, the latter adding tumor primary site to tumor size and nuclear split phase count parameter indexes and introduced a comprehensive scoring method to classify them ( 16 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 394 patients were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients who received radical treatment between January 2010 and December 2014 were assigned into the training cohort (n=280), while patients from January 2015 to June 2016 were assigned into the validation cohort (n=114) for validation (12,13). The TNM staging system 8 th edition was retrospectively used for all of the patients in our study.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%