2019
DOI: 10.2147/idr.s228699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p>Optimizing compliance with surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery at a referral teaching hospital in southern Iran: clinical and economic impact [Corrigendum]</p>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Receiving invasive procedures is a wellestablished risk factor of nosocomial BSI, and therefore antimicrobial prophylaxis before or after a procedure is indicated in some situations [10][11][12][13]. However, there are also concerns about the inappropriateness of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis [14][15][16], which may lead to unnecessary cost and contribute to the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance [17][18][19]. For cardiac surgery, routine antibiotic prophylaxis is generally recommended given the significant and large benefit observed in trials, although detailed recommendations on duration and timing varies between guidelines [20]; while for interventional cardiac catheterization, antibiotic prophylaxis is only recommended for patients at high risk of infective endocarditis [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Receiving invasive procedures is a wellestablished risk factor of nosocomial BSI, and therefore antimicrobial prophylaxis before or after a procedure is indicated in some situations [10][11][12][13]. However, there are also concerns about the inappropriateness of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis [14][15][16], which may lead to unnecessary cost and contribute to the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance [17][18][19]. For cardiac surgery, routine antibiotic prophylaxis is generally recommended given the significant and large benefit observed in trials, although detailed recommendations on duration and timing varies between guidelines [20]; while for interventional cardiac catheterization, antibiotic prophylaxis is only recommended for patients at high risk of infective endocarditis [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9] Given the well-established instructions, an appropriate antibiotic/antimicrobial agent should protect patients against SSI-causing pathogens, be established at the appropriate time, and be administered only for 24 h. 10 Despite the accessibility to these surgical prophylaxis guidelines, studies evaluating surgical prophylaxis demonstrated that inappropriate timing of antibiotic administration, inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, and long duration of antibiotic therapy develop complications in surgical prophylaxis. [11][12][13] Overall agreement for the application of prophylactic antibiotic guidelines is widely diverse with low-frequency in the world, ranging from less than 1% in Iran 14,15 and Korea 16 to 28%, 33.2%, 36.3%, and 41.1% in Dutch 5 Malaysian, 17 Greek, 18 and French, 19 respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the accessibility to these surgical prophylaxis guidelines, studies evaluating surgical prophylaxis demonstrated that inappropriate timing of antibiotic administration, inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, and long duration of antibiotic therapy develop complications in surgical prophylaxis. 11-13…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%