<p>Preferences for the administration of testosterone gel: evidence from a discrete choice experiment</p>

Abstract

Objectives: Differences in testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) gel products may affect patient satisfaction, quality-of-life, and treatment response and adherence. This study investigated preferences for TRT gel in terms of formulation and administration. Methods: 525 male adults aged 45 years and over completed a discrete choice experiment. Respondents made repeated choices between two hypothetical testosterone gel treatments described according to four attributes: form, ease of use, impact of use on showering/swimming, and location/dosage of the application. Choice data were analyzed using a latent class model. Results: Three preference classes were identified. Respondents across all classes displayed a preference for the gel being dispensed in smaller units with accurate dosing, waiting shorter times after the gel application before swimming/showering, and using 2.5 gm of gel to be applied to the inner thigh/abdomen as opposed 5 gm to shoulder/abdomen. The importance of these characteristics differed across classes, with preference class membership predicted by age and education level. For instance, younger men (aged 45–64 years) were more likely to belong to a class that prioritized reduced waiting time before being able to undertake activities. Formulation was not an important driver of choice. Conclusions: Preferences demonstrate a predilection for TRT gel dispensed in small units allowing precise dosing, shorter waiting time after application, and application to the inner thigh/abdomen. However, the strength of importance of these characteristics differs between men. This study highlights the attributes of TRT gel considered important to patient subgroups, and which may ultimately affect treatment response, medication adherence, and patient quality-of-life.

The Roles of Androgens in Humans: Biology, Metabolic Regulation and Health

“…The (usually) daily transdermal administration of T using patches [ 450 , 451 ] or the extension of hydro-alcoholic gels over bare skin [ 452 , 453 ] have the advantage of relative immediacy, and the possibility to control the time of exposure to the hormone [ 454 ]. Its main problems are the cumbersome procedure of extension (gel) or the limited area of application (patches).…”

Pharmacokinetics of testosterone therapies in relation to diurnal variation of serum testosterone levels as men age

“…Because of their convenience and ease of application, transdermal T gels and solutions are among the most commonly used formulations and have been preferred by many patients 57,58 . Users of T gel have indicated a preference for a gel formulation that can dispense accurate T doses in a small gel volume in the inner thigh/abdomen and one with a shorter waiting time after application before showering and/or swimming 59 . Currently, there are four branded, FDA‐approved hydroalcoholic T gels available: AndroGel ® , FORTESTA ® , TESTIM ® , and VOGELXO ® .…”

“… 57 , 58 Users of T gel have indicated a preference for a gel formulation that can dispense accurate T doses in a small gel volume in the inner thigh/abdomen and one with a shorter waiting time after application before showering and/or swimming. 59 Currently, there are four branded, FDA‐approved hydroalcoholic T gels available: AndroGel ® , FORTESTA ® , TESTIM ® , and VOGELXO ® . Despite its convenience, for most patients, serum T levels fall under the normal range within 24 h of applying transdermal 2% T gel, requiring daily application of product.…”