2019
DOI: 10.2147/ott.s194138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p>Research status and progress of the RNA or protein biomarkers for prostate cancer</p>

Abstract: Prostate cancer is a kind of male malignancy. Recently, a large number of studies have reported many potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. In this literature review, we have collected a number of potential biomarkers for prostate cancer reported in the last 5 years. Among them, some are undergoing Phase III clinical trials, and others have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. However, most are still in the period of basic research. The review will contribute … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, none of the clinical parameters (i.e., PSA and its derivatives such as PHI), biomarkers (i.e., PCA3), or combinations of biomarkers or clinical parameters (i.e., PCA3 combined with TMPRSS2:ERG, microRNA signatures, metabolomic biomarkers) used in clinical practice or reported in publications was able to diagnose PCa or stratify cancer risk with > 90% sensitivity and specificity, and AUC over 0.9, as shown in several recent reviews [ 2 , 4 – 6 , 8 10 , 25 27 ]. Our 25-Gene Panel urine test was validated for accurate cancer diagnosis by two independent multi-center study cohorts as well as the large combination cohort with uniformly high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity above 90% and AUC exceeding 0.9.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Currently, none of the clinical parameters (i.e., PSA and its derivatives such as PHI), biomarkers (i.e., PCA3), or combinations of biomarkers or clinical parameters (i.e., PCA3 combined with TMPRSS2:ERG, microRNA signatures, metabolomic biomarkers) used in clinical practice or reported in publications was able to diagnose PCa or stratify cancer risk with > 90% sensitivity and specificity, and AUC over 0.9, as shown in several recent reviews [ 2 , 4 – 6 , 8 10 , 25 27 ]. Our 25-Gene Panel urine test was validated for accurate cancer diagnosis by two independent multi-center study cohorts as well as the large combination cohort with uniformly high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity above 90% and AUC exceeding 0.9.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Furthermore, lncRNAs expression was inhibited by the use of antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) or small molecule inhibitors [76]. Among them, some are undergoing Phase III clinical trials in prostate cancer, so far; however, most are still in the period of basic research [77].…”
Section: Clinical Utility Of Ncrnasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies indicate that changes in DNA methylation contribute to cancer development and regulation. Cancers characteristically display extensive hypomethylation of DNA repeats as well as frequent focal DNA hypermethylation 22 , 23 . Toth et al 24 attain good prognostic performance with a Random Forest algorithm, to discriminate patients according to eventual recurrence-free survival as an outcome, measured by PSA levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%