2020
DOI: 10.2147/clep.s242097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p>Synthetic and External Controls in Clinical Trials – A Primer for Researchers</p>

Abstract: There has been a rapid expansion in the use of non-randomized evidence in the regulatory approval of treatments globally. An emerging set of methodologies have been utilized to provide greater insight into external control data used for these purposes, collectively known as synthetic control methods. Through this paper, we provide the reader with a set of key questions to help assess the quality of literature publications utilizing synthetic control methodologies. Common challenges and real-life examples of sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
192
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
192
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the use of external comparator groups has been used to supplement findings of single‐arm trials, their use has been largely limited to rare diseases where treatment effects are relatively large and the clinical inferences relatively resistant to bias. Existing methods for nonrandomized studies need to undergo prospective and transparent validation before they can be used to support regulatory decision making 32–34 . This methodological study assessed the impact of selecting comparator groups using real‐world data by assessing the effects of temporality, comparator choice, and confounding control using variations of propensity score‐based methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the use of external comparator groups has been used to supplement findings of single‐arm trials, their use has been largely limited to rare diseases where treatment effects are relatively large and the clinical inferences relatively resistant to bias. Existing methods for nonrandomized studies need to undergo prospective and transparent validation before they can be used to support regulatory decision making 32–34 . This methodological study assessed the impact of selecting comparator groups using real‐world data by assessing the effects of temporality, comparator choice, and confounding control using variations of propensity score‐based methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing methods for nonrandomized studies need to undergo prospective and transparent validation before they can be used to support regulatory decision making. [32][33][34] This methodological study assessed the impact of selecting comparator groups using real-world data by assessing the effects of temporality, comparator choice, and confounding control using variations of propensity score-based methods. Recommendations are presented in Table 5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synthetic and external controls in clinical trials are becoming increasingly popular (Thorlund et al, 2020). Synthetic controls refer to cohorts that have been composed from real observational cohorts or EHR using statistical methodologies.…”
Section: Opportunities and Application To Current Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synthetic controls refer to cohorts that have been composed from real observational cohorts or EHR using statistical methodologies. While the individuals included in the cohorts are usually left unchanged, micro-simulations of disease progression at the patient level are used to explore long-term outcomes and help in the estimation of treatment effects (Thorlund et al, 2020;Etzioni et al, 2002). Synthetic data generated by GANs could be transformative for the problem of finding control cohorts.…”
Section: Opportunities and Application To Current Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%