2020
DOI: 10.2147/opth.s270934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p>Vitreoretinal Surgery in the Post-Lockdown Era: Making the Case for Combined Phacovitrectomy</p>

Abstract: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly limited the capacity of healthcare systems to provide elective services like cataract surgery. Cataract formation is a frequent complication after pars plana vitrectomy. In this paper, we review the pros and cons of combined phacovitrectomy as opposed to sequential surgery in the postpandemic era. In particular, we discuss the patient-level visual benefits and societal economic advantages of this procedure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the vision impairment caused by post-vitrectomy cataract formation and the prolonged duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown, even non-emergent surgeries like cataract removal may be inevitable to maintain the quality of life of the patients. It seems reasonable to perform phacovitrectomy instead of vitrectomy alone whenever possible to minimize the number of visits and operations in ophthalmology centers [ 22 ]. Also, this combined procedure decreases the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) by 50% compared with sequential surgery and saves costs per patients by 17–20% [ 23 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the vision impairment caused by post-vitrectomy cataract formation and the prolonged duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown, even non-emergent surgeries like cataract removal may be inevitable to maintain the quality of life of the patients. It seems reasonable to perform phacovitrectomy instead of vitrectomy alone whenever possible to minimize the number of visits and operations in ophthalmology centers [ 22 ]. Also, this combined procedure decreases the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) by 50% compared with sequential surgery and saves costs per patients by 17–20% [ 23 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to postoperative complications involving the crystalline lens, more than half of phakic patients who underwent vitrectomy for RRD repair subsequently needed cataract surgery within 1 year [5]. Thus, combined phacovitrectomy was encouraged for patients aged 50 or older due to the lower cost of surgery, reduced complications and better visual outcome [6][7][8][9]. In 10-17% of cases of RRD with macular involvement, it was impossible to measure the axial length (AL) using optic biometry (IOLMaster) because of the limitations of the machine, such as dense media opacity, poor fixation by the patients or the lack of an available machine [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 With consideration of the implications of delay in surgery and economic benefits, authors have advocated for bilateral surgeries 35 and combined procedures such as phacovitrectomy. 36 In addition to the delay to surgery while a patient is on the wait-list, there is an inherent delay in presentation to specialized surgical care. [37][38][39] These delays are shown to be further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic and patient hesitation to seeking care in the ophthalmology setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%