1994
DOI: 10.1117/12.177275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Application of multiframe iterative blind deconvolution for diverse astronomical imaging</title>

Abstract: We present applications of a recently developed Iterative Blind Deconvolution algorithm to both simulated and real data. The applications demonstrate the algorithm's performance for a wide range of astronomical imaging. We demonstrate the effectiveness of using multiple observations of the same object convolved with different point spread functions. We also show the extension of the algorithm to phase retrieval when the object Fourier amplitude is available.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A major question concerns the uniqueness of the solutions obtained from blind deconvolution. While Miura and Baba (1995) claim that their reconstructions are unique, Christou et al (1994) failed to find a converging algorithm for solar images.…”
Section: Deconvolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major question concerns the uniqueness of the solutions obtained from blind deconvolution. While Miura and Baba (1995) claim that their reconstructions are unique, Christou et al (1994) failed to find a converging algorithm for solar images.…”
Section: Deconvolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AO images in a real system are usually represented by the convolution of an ideal image with a point spread function (PSF) [ 3 ]. The AO image is also contaminated by other noises, such as read-out, photon counting, multiplicative, and compression noise [ 4 , 5 ]. In most practical applications, however, finding the real PSF is impossible and an estimation must be carried out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 Consequently, multiple-frame deconvolution should result in systematically lower error bounds with more reliable results than when individual image frames are deconvolved separately or when multiple frames are merged into an averaged "shift-and-added" image (i.e., an image generated by averaging the image frames after appropriate pixel shifts are made to maximize image correlation) and then deconvolved. 2,11,[33][34][35][36] The extension to multi-frame deconvolution is straightforward. For multiple-image observations, Eq.…”
Section: Extension To Multiple-frame Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3(B)] with a contrast enhancement of about 50%. Average contrast improvement was computed by multiple (N ≥ 6) comparisons of average intensities over an area of 3 × 3 pixels within a region of interest (I ROI ) versus over an adjacent background region (I background ) (separated by at least 4 pixels, the FWHM of the PSF): (35) Using the definition (36) we see signal-to-noise improvements of 6.2, 4.2, and 2.4 dB for the deconvolution results of SNR = 0, 10, and 20 dB images, respectively. Figure 4 shows the deconvolution results for the SNR = 20 dB image of Fig.…”
Section: Validation and Application To Mono-frame Datamentioning
confidence: 99%