1991
DOI: 10.1117/12.44542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Buried object remote detection technology for law enforcement</title>

Abstract: We have developed a precise airborne temperature-sensing technology to detect buried objects for use by law enforcement. Demonstrations have imaged the sites of buried foundations, walls and trenches; mapped underground waterways and aquifers; and been used to locate underground military objects. Our patented methodology is incorporated in a commercially available, high signal-to-noise, dual-band infrared scanner with real-time, 12-bit digital image processing software and display. Our method creates color-cod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding that such detection capabilities have been reported, little measurements have been performed (and published [7, 8, 9]) to evaluate quantitatively the apparent contrast in temperature that can be expected from buried mines when observed with an IR imager. The work done by Del Grande [7,8] shows impressive results about the temperature contrasts of buried objects, filled holes and grass-covered sites with a dual-band IR imaging system. The work presented in this report aims to complete this research by evaluating the apparent temperature contrasts of buried mines over a 24-hour interval for different burial depths and types of soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notwithstanding that such detection capabilities have been reported, little measurements have been performed (and published [7, 8, 9]) to evaluate quantitatively the apparent contrast in temperature that can be expected from buried mines when observed with an IR imager. The work done by Del Grande [7,8] shows impressive results about the temperature contrasts of buried objects, filled holes and grass-covered sites with a dual-band IR imaging system. The work presented in this report aims to complete this research by evaluating the apparent temperature contrasts of buried mines over a 24-hour interval for different burial depths and types of soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results describe the apparent temperature contrast at the soil surface where mines are buried. The measuring instrument is an IR camera (8)(9)(10)(11)(12) and acquisitions are made over 24-hour periods. Furthermore, these acquisition periods are achieved for 3 types of anti-tank mine and 3 types of soil: top s0il, clay, and masonry sand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acoustic heart valve data was processed to recognize trends and correlations between SLS (single leg separation) and INT (intact) valves. The features investigated included: frequency spectra, coefficients from spectral models (including lattice parameters, predictor parameters, and correlation coefficients), first-order statistical features, second-order texture features, and other representations of the data [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] .…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…California A helicopter-borne demonstration of DBIR imaging was conducted at a pasture in Byron, California (about 15 miles north ofLLNL). [5,6] Our goal was to locate buried surrogate mines and distinguish them from surface targets or clutter. The test area, measured approximately 100 m 2 and, apart from clutter (e.g., squirrel tunnels, a coiled cable), consisted mostly of grass-covered sandy loam soil.…”
Section: Dbir Technique For Locating Buried Mlnefieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] We first use physical principles to compute ratios of physical measurements (temperature and emissivity) and then apply them to the images. Temperature in I(d) and emissivity-ratio in I(e) images differ for natural soil and surface objects (e.g., the markers and perimeter metal strip).…”
Section: Image Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%