2002
DOI: 10.1117/12.465568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Characterization of a full-field digital mammography detector based on direct x-ray conversion in selenium</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The key factor has been the strong development of detector technology that enables to maintain high enough spatial and contrast resolution as well as adequate quantum efficiency with low noise level. Current digital detector technologies in screening mammography include charge-coupled device (CCD) and indirect and direct flat panel detectors [1]- [4]. Among others, CMOS technology and photon counting technology are under development [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key factor has been the strong development of detector technology that enables to maintain high enough spatial and contrast resolution as well as adequate quantum efficiency with low noise level. Current digital detector technologies in screening mammography include charge-coupled device (CCD) and indirect and direct flat panel detectors [1]- [4]. Among others, CMOS technology and photon counting technology are under development [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This statement is reflected by measurement results for two flat detectors, currently available with these two competing X-ray conversion materials. A detector based on a-Se/a-Si [35]featuring a pixel size of 70 μm which corresponds to a Nyquist frequency of 7.2 lp/mm-exhibits significantly higher DQE values over the whole spatial frequency range than a detector based on CsI/a-Si [36] which has a pixel size of 100 μm, corresponding to a Nyquist frequency of 5 lp/mm.…”
Section: Modulation Transfer Functionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The upper limit for the MTF is defined by assuming that the pixel aperture constitutes the only blur mechanism. It is quantitatively determined as a 0018-9499/$20.00 © 2006 IEEE function of spatial frequency and pixel aperture by the sinc function being defined as (1) which would describe the MTF of an ideal detector in one dimension related to an orientation in the spatial frequency plane parallel to one of the pixel lattice directions (2) The idealized MTF in diagonal direction [12] for a square pixel can be derived from the two-dimensional MTF (3) and is given by (4) The curves in this work are calculated up to the frequency where the sinc function equals zero. The values above the Nyquist frequency (i.e.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D IGITAL mammography systems with detectors based on amorphous selenium are currently being introduced [1], [2]. Mammography systems with a detector combining a scintillator and a photodiode matrix are already in the market, e.g., the systems of G. E. Medical Systems [3] and Fischer [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%