2000
DOI: 10.1117/12.404777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Comparative evaluation of the volume holographic memory information capacity limits caused by different limitation factors</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pixel pitch of SLM is 20 μm and we use 2 × 2 pixels to denote 1 phase data. We set 50 × 50 fourlevel phase data in the signal part and a similar amount of (6) four-level phase data in the reference part of the data page. The pixel pitch of CMOS is 5.86 μm, and we captured twice the Nyquist size of the Fourier intensity of the input.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pixel pitch of SLM is 20 μm and we use 2 × 2 pixels to denote 1 phase data. We set 50 × 50 fourlevel phase data in the signal part and a similar amount of (6) four-level phase data in the reference part of the data page. The pixel pitch of CMOS is 5.86 μm, and we captured twice the Nyquist size of the Fourier intensity of the input.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical holographic storage can encode and store data information in two ways: amplitude modulation and phase modulation. Because of its signal-to-noise ratio and encoding rate are relatively low, the amplitude-modulated holography storage technology has been unable to meet the current explosive data storage requirements gradually [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%