2000
DOI: 10.1117/12.392578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Comparison of methods for 3D target localization from seismic and acoustic signatures</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the field of passive acoustical applications, sparse arrays have been used for localization of transients in different applications. For seismology applications, a multistatic system localized and imaged transients in [3]. In [4], clicks from sperm whales were localized by 5 arrays consisting of 5 sensors each spread several kilometers apart in the water and situated at a depth of up to one kilometer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of passive acoustical applications, sparse arrays have been used for localization of transients in different applications. For seismology applications, a multistatic system localized and imaged transients in [3]. In [4], clicks from sperm whales were localized by 5 arrays consisting of 5 sensors each spread several kilometers apart in the water and situated at a depth of up to one kilometer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%