1995
DOI: 10.1117/12.205371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Comparison of wavelet image coders using picture quality scale (PQS)</title>

Abstract: Image coding is one of the most visible applications of wavelets. There has been increasing number of reports each y ear since the late 1980's on the design of new wavelet coders and variations to existing ones. In this paper, we report some results from our comparative study of wavelet image coders using a perception-based, quantitative picture quality scale as the distortion measure. Coders are evaluated in rate-distortion sense the in uences of di erent w avelets, quantizers, and encoders are assessed indiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Effect of quantization and coding on the compression ratio has been investigated by several investigators and will not be addressed in this study. 14,15 Selection of different types of methods for quantization and coding may change the compression ratio, but the general relationship between the compression ratio with masking and that without masking will remain unchanged. Selection of type of quantization and coding may also depend on the type of images to be compressed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effect of quantization and coding on the compression ratio has been investigated by several investigators and will not be addressed in this study. 14,15 Selection of different types of methods for quantization and coding may change the compression ratio, but the general relationship between the compression ratio with masking and that without masking will remain unchanged. Selection of type of quantization and coding may also depend on the type of images to be compressed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal threshold limit that corresponds to 99.6% of retained energy is selected automatically. The recovered energy is calculated by using a secondorder vector norm as E ϭ ȽÎȽ 2 ሻIሻ 2 ϫ 100, [9] where I and Î are the decomposed image before and after thresholding, respectively.…”
Section: Coefficent Thresholdingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research is concerned with the first two blocks. The last two blocks are standard (8)(9)(10)(11)(12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because with the same level of quality, fewer coefficients are needed to represent an image than the number of coefficients required by Discrete Cosine Transform [9]. Although wavelet compression has proved its advantage over Discrete Cosine Transform based compression, wavelet representation of images differ in their choice of wavelets, hence a wavelet can only be the best choice for compression of a certain class of images but not for all kind of images [10,11] .…”
Section: Image Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%