2002
DOI: 10.1117/12.458407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Correlators for rank order shape similarity measurement</title>

Abstract: Correlators have been used for detecting shapes but not as often for measuring shape similarity. The complex inner product (CIP) has been used in various formulations as a shape similarity measure. The CIP is essentially a one-dimensional correlation approach to measuring similarity. One-dimensional variants of the correlation techniques including the matched filter (MF), phase-only filter (POF), and amplitude-modulated phase only filter (AMPOF) are shown to measure shape similarity in a trend that approaches … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang et al (2005) proposed a correlation templatematching algorithm for searching target in the estimation position's neighbour in order to get target's accurate position. Gregga et al (2002) discussed to use correlation techniques including the matched filter and phase-only filter for rank order shape similarity measurement. Liu (2005) ferent algorithms in order to find an appropriate filter for grinding forces measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al (2005) proposed a correlation templatematching algorithm for searching target in the estimation position's neighbour in order to get target's accurate position. Gregga et al (2002) discussed to use correlation techniques including the matched filter and phase-only filter for rank order shape similarity measurement. Liu (2005) ferent algorithms in order to find an appropriate filter for grinding forces measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] Shape of a desired object can vary from the template for a variety of reasons including noise, blur, and other artifacts in sensors and imaging. Another factor in template matching is object classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] [35] where Z(m) is normalized according to Z(m) √ t |z(t)| 2 such that 0.0 is the minimum (least similar) and 1.0 is the maximum (most similar):…”
Section: Identification Of Known Match Rac Pairsmentioning
confidence: 99%