1991
DOI: 10.1117/12.45428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Display for advanced research and training: an inexpensive answer to tactical simulation</title>

Abstract: About three years ago, we realized that the cost per channel of computerized scene generation would likely drop rapidly in the future. We also realized that the cost of visual projectors was similarly decreasing. From this, we concluded that a full field-of-view display, consisting of many scene generation channels and projectors, could become economically feasible. Phase I of this project was tested by installing eight rear screen projectors on eight facets of a dodecahedron, and driving it with six channels … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The visual display systems employed in high-fidelity full field-of-view flight simulators are often optically complex, large, and expensive. 1,2 However, a display system has recently been described, 3 t h a t c o u l d pro vide h ighl y detailed, wide-field imagery using relatively simple, lightweight, and inexpensive optical components. The system employs a head-mounted miniature display and projection optics to place an image at the plane of a retroreflecting screen located about 1-6 m from the user.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The visual display systems employed in high-fidelity full field-of-view flight simulators are often optically complex, large, and expensive. 1,2 However, a display system has recently been described, 3 t h a t c o u l d pro vide h ighl y detailed, wide-field imagery using relatively simple, lightweight, and inexpensive optical components. The system employs a head-mounted miniature display and projection optics to place an image at the plane of a retroreflecting screen located about 1-6 m from the user.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 2, the Michelson Contrast or modulation depth (introduced in the subsection "Luminance Modulation: Contrast Measures") has been measured for two display devices, the Display for Advanced Research Training (DART) (Thomas, Reining, & Kelly, 1990) and a limited field-of-view (LFOV) dome display in use at the Armstrong Laboratory, Williams AFB, AZ. If either display had better modulation at all spatial frequencies, that display device would be assumed to provide better image quality given all other parameters were equal (e.g., luminance, color, temporal properties).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thomas and Reining (1990) have described its design and construction. Geometrically, the DART is a geodesic dome made up of flat, five-sided, rear-projection screens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%