2003
DOI: 10.1117/12.476811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Empirical evaluation of a JPEG2000 standard-based robust watermarking scheme</title>

Abstract: In this paper an empirical evaluation of the lossy compression properties of the JPEG2000 standard for watermarking purposes is performed. The JPEG2000 standard is used as a basic tool for determining both how and where the embedded watermark should be placed in the image. The original image is slightly modified in order to generate a similar image (indistinguishable by the observer), and the mark is embedded in the pixels presenting differences between both images. Previous experiments show that the propertie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As remarked in Section 4, the parameters used for the different compression algorithms were the default settings. Therefore, a deeper study on how the different parameters affect the robustness of the watermarking scheme obtained should be done, specially for the two most promising lossy compression methods, namely the JPEG2000 standard [7] and the SPIHT coder. In addition, the results presented show that the different watermarking schemes proposed have complementary robustness properties.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As remarked in Section 4, the parameters used for the different compression algorithms were the default settings. Therefore, a deeper study on how the different parameters affect the robustness of the watermarking scheme obtained should be done, specially for the two most promising lossy compression methods, namely the JPEG2000 standard [7] and the SPIHT coder. In addition, the results presented show that the different watermarking schemes proposed have complementary robustness properties.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%